After the dramatic terrorist attack that occurred in New Orleans, Louisiana, on New Years day, declared to be carried out by 42-year-old Shamsud Din Jabbar, killing 15 and injuring 35 others on Bourbon Street, the calls for much more intrusive surveillance have increased.

Reported by Reclaim The Net (excerpts):


Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams has rekindled alarm over privacy and surveillance in the wake of a tragic New Year’s Eve terror attack in New Orleans. Drawing parallels to the sweeping changes implemented in the aftermath of 9/11, Williams hinted at a push for heightened monitoring measures across the city and beyond, citing European surveillance systems as a model.

During an MSNBC interview, Williams argued that public safety at large-scale events necessitates a reevaluation of privacy norms. “Things are going to have to change,” he remarked, suggesting that Americans should prepare for a shift in how pedestrian spaces and vehicle access are managed during high-profile events. “I think you’re going to see things change in terms of the level of surveillance that we have in this country.”

Williams praised the widespread use of CCTV cameras in countries like the United Kingdom, which he described as proactive tools for identifying threats. “We push back against some of that,” he admitted but added that European cities demonstrate the effectiveness of such measures.


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

This terrorist attack, along with the one in Las Vegas, Nevada, with that exploding Tesla Cybertruck, is a classic problem, reaction, solution; and as the old adage goes, “never let a good crisis go to waste.” We have all sorts of evidence that this was probably controlled. Leo Hohmann documented the FBI’s hypocrisy and how they kept changing the narrative; and the Las Vegas car-bombing reeks, to me, of MK-Ultra mind-control.

But we should expect nothing less when it comes to calls for more surveillance; and with the rapid push to force the world to accept digital IDs, CBDCs and tokenized assets, it should not surprise anyone that more surveillance is needed, one way or another.

Jeremiah 22:17 But thine eyes and thine heart are not but for thy covetousness, and for to shed innocent blood, and for oppression, and for violence, to do it.


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

1,059 Comments

  • Great goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too excellent. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is really a great site.

Leave a Comment