The change in policy was highlighted by a large X account called Wall Street Apes, which cited a short video by a young women who was reviewing her coverage, and displays a piece of the official document that explains what the insurer will not cover. The original video was published to TikTok by WFF News.
The lady said in the video:
“Y’all need to check your insurance policies. Listen to this. This is something that made me go, As you may know, I have had my insurance license in the state of California for over a decade. And when I was reviewing policies for 2024, I noticed this new exclusion. Look here.
This is under “exclusions and expenses” not covered on a 2024 Cigna health policy. “Treatment of an injury or a sickness, which is due to war, declared or undeclared, riot, or insurrection.” This is not typical. This is an insurance policy from United last year for 2023, and the language typically reads like this. What happens with my coverage under extraordinary circumstances?
And it says in cases of disaster, epidemic, war, riot, insurrection, that they will do their best to provide the services you need. But now take a look at United’s 2024 health insurance policy, another exclusion: T, war – “We do not cover an illness, treatment or medical condition due to war declared or undeclared.”
Cigna and United aren’t the only ones that have change their language excluding war from their policies. Anthem has also done this, and it just makes you wonder why in the world would that be the case?”
This same wording can be found on Sigma’s general “State Disclosures, Exclusions, Limitations, and Reductions” page.
Naturally, the fact-checkers responded to this video, with Meta-aligned Lead Stories claiming that this is “old language,” and claimed to have found other instances of insurers using identical language in years past.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
Even if similar policies have existed in years past, that doesn’t make it any less scummy and shady; and the fact that one of the largest health insurance firms in the country has now decided to update their policy to include this now, is quite questionable indeed.
If you follow The WP, you know that a greater expansion of war is inevitable, and perhaps Cigna is already making sure they are not liable for anything. Typical.
He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it: and he that hateth suretiship is sure.
Proverbs 11:15
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
So, even if ya happen to live in an area where such things happen; sorry all the money ya paid in for your health ins, too bad so sad, HA HA no coverage for you.
Try and fight that one in court; same result bubkas for you. Evil, evil people, who take the money and run and hide.
In Canada, most property insurers have had that clause in their policies for many years. They also included the words, “terrorism” or “acts of terrorism”. Obviously, over 20 years ago, they knew this was coming. Most just never noticed it because they don’t take the time to read their policies. Shame on them!
Insurance is the same as usury, and what did Christ DO TO those people? And he’s certainly not returning as a sacrificial lamb.