FDA Considers Rule To Force Front-Of-Package Nutrition Labeling

The following report is a press release by the Food and Drug Administration, published on January 14th:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to require a front-of-package (FOP) nutrition label on most packaged foods to provide accessible, at-a-glance information to help consumers quickly and easily identify how foods can be part of a healthy diet. 

The proposed FOP nutrition label, referred to as the Nutrition Info box, would detail and interpret the relative amounts of three nutrients—saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars—in a serving of food and would appear on the package’s front so that it is immediately visible when a consumer is deciding whether to buy, use, or eat the food. Current federal dietary recommendations advise U.S. consumers to limit these three nutrients to achieve a nutrient-dense diet within calorie limits.  

While calories would not be included in the Nutrition Info box, a manufacturer could voluntarily include a calorie statement on the front of the food package, per existing FDA regulations. See additional Nutrition Info box examples, including those listing calories near the box.

Diet-related chronic diseases in the United States are the leading causes of death and disability. Many of these chronic diseases are experienced at higher rates by certain racial and ethnic minority groups and those with lower socioeconomic status, compared to the overall average. Healthy eating patterns, which are, among other things, lower in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars, are associated with improved health, such as reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancers. Providing informative and accessible food labeling empowers consumers to make informed choices.

The proposed Nutrition Info box would complement the Nutrition Facts label that is already required on most packaged food. While many consumers use and benefit from the Nutrition Facts label, regular use of the label is lower among some segments of the population. The Nutrition Info box would quickly provide context for consumers on the front of food packages by detailing and interpreting (through “Low,” “Med,” or “High” descriptions) the relative amount of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars in a serving of food. Other countries have successfully implemented FOP nutrition labeling, and our research and other data show that our proposed Nutrition Info box could be useful for U.S. consumers. 

The FDA conducted a literature review, two sets of focus group testing, and a peer-reviewed experimental study to explore consumer reactions and responses to various FOP nutrition labels. The first set of focus group testing provided FDA with qualitative feedback and insight into the varying ways that consumers react to and comprehend FOP nutrition information and helped us understand which schemes might be most helpful for U.S. consumers to quickly and easily identify how foods can be part of a healthy diet. The second set of focus group testing showed that participants viewed the FOP nutrition information on beverages and non-beverage products similarly. The experimental study showed that the black and white “Nutrition Info” scheme with the quantitative and interpretive percent Daily Value performed best in helping consumers identify healthier food options in a number of instances. These results align with the scientific literature, which indicates that interpretive FOP nutrition information is helpful for consumers and simpler schemes are easier for consumers to understand.

The proposed rule would establish a compliance date of three years after the final rule’s effective date for businesses with $10 million or more in annual food sales and a compliance date of four years after the final rule’s effective date for businesses with less than $10 million in annual food sales. 

---

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

The FDA, still refusing to publish factual and truthful information, has continued its crusade against saturated fats (among other things); which do not lead to heart disease, clogged arteries, diabetes, fatty liver, etc.; but rather is a natural key component to a healthy diet that should be consumed on a regular basis.

Isaiah 7:15 Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good.

But this is the same government, and some of the top academic schools, that want us to believe that highly-processed cereal and M&Ms are healthier than butter, beef and eggs.

SEE: Head Of Biden’s Nutrition Conference Summit Says Highly-Processed And Sugary Junk Food Is Better Than Beef And Eggs

The whole point of this proposed labeling is to try and scare uneducated and stubborn parents into not buying certain foods that are listed as having too much saturated fat, and if passed will probably prove to be acutely successful, though, thankfully, the younger generations are waking up to the lies that our parents were told and accepted.

---

[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE