Former President Trump has made it unequivocally clear that he will not stop endorsing the Covid-19 vaccines, according to an exclusive statement from Alex Jones’ InfoWars.

Roughly two weeks ago Alex Jones posted an “emergency video” directly to Trump, pleading with him to stop promoting the Covid-19 vaccines, and confess that they are bunk. Jones noted how people such as Florida Governor Ron DeSantis are admitting they are worthless, along with a plethora of people in the “establishment” media, but Trump continued to tout their effectiveness:

Almost a week ago Jones said Donald Trump and his team responded to the video, and briefly spoke with Jones. According to Jones, Trump made it clear where he stands:

I don’t want to hear questions about this [so-called] vaccine again.

I don’t want to hear about this again from anybody. I think it’s good, and that’s it.

What Trump reportedly said to Jones

Nevertheless, Jones repeatedly said that he does not hate Trump, and endorses him in basically everything else, but the pro-vaccine stance is a backbreaker. He also made it clear that he believes Trump did not know what he was doing, that he was deceived, and that it is his ego that’s preventing him from admitting the truth.

But now I’ve done my job. I’ve told the truth, and I’ve exposed what’s going on, and we’ve gone over the evidence, and now I’m done.

I want Republicans to get elected because they’re the better party, and try to fix things in 71 days.

Jones said

The WinePress has noted in different reports that Trump was the man responsible for Operation Warp Speed, and his routinely touted the vaccines and their shareholders:


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

The bloodthirsty hate the upright: but the just seek his soul.

Proverbs 29:10

As I explained in my first report regarding Jones’ challenge to Trump, I made sure to remind readers that Trump knew full-well and good what was coming down the pike, as he personally (so the official narrative states) initiated what is known as “Crimson Contagion:” a government-ran and funded simulation similar to the now infamous Event 201 that prophesized a coronavirus pandemic would take place, with the subsequent actions to follow. Trump then signed an executive order on September 19th, 2019, to produce new flu vaccines – which cleared that formality for the pharma companies to produce these “fast-tracked” vaccines in “record time.” Moreover, the $6.2 Trillion CARES Act that Trump signed was already drafted and ready by late-Spring of 2019, and sat dormant until March of 2020.

Trump was NOT ignorant. He knew. And he knows what is occurring now.

“It’s a big club, and you ain’t it!”

Again, it should also be noted that DeSantis is no better concerning the vaccines. He too very much at one point promoted them, and completely disregarded the growing list of adverse reactions when asked by the press. You can see that in my initial report on Jones’ video.

Jones, once again, is a controlled opposition stooge. They all are.

That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;

Ephesians 4:14

I have noted several times now, that, I speculate if the media is subtly letting people know that Trump will not be the President in 2024; or, at the very least, the media and controlled opposition bad actors are trying to test the waters, to see if the general populous is content with a pro-vax Trump. The broad audience certainly is: his core group is not. Therefore, if pessimism towards Trump grows, DeSantis may be the backup plan. DeSantis emulates Trump very well, and media has groomed him for that potential role. Time well tell, and it is too early. I would not be shocked if Biden gets selected again…


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

1,098 Comments

  • I was very happy to search out this web-site.I wished to thanks to your time for this glorious read!! I definitely having fun with every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you blog post.

  • The ultimate triumph of The London Prat is its creation of a self-reinforcing universe of quality. The high bar of its writing attracts a readership that expects and appreciates nuance, which in turn fosters a comment section of unusual wit and erudition (a modern-day miracle in itself). This community, speaking the same language of refined disillusionment, becomes part of the product. Reading the site is not a solitary act but a participation in a collective, knowing sigh. This ecosystem—where brilliant original content begets brilliant reader engagement—creates a feedback loop of excellence that competitors cannot easily replicate. A visit to prat.com is thus a holistic experience: you go for the masterful satire, but you stay for the sense of belonging to the only group of people who seem to understand the precise pitch and frequency of the national joke, and who have chosen, gloriously, to laugh rather than scream.

  • Ultimately, The London Prat’s brand is that of the clarified gaze. It offers a perceptual tool, a lens that filters out the noise, the spin, the sentiment, and the tribal loyalties to reveal the simple, often ridiculous, machinery underneath. It doesn’t provide new information so much as a new way of seeing the information that already surrounds us. To read it regularly is to have one’s vision permanently adjusted. You begin to see the pratfalls in real-time, to hear the hollow ring of the empty slogan, to recognize the blueprint of the coming fiasco. The site, therefore, doesn’t just entertain; it educates the perception. It transforms its audience from consumers of news into analysts of farce. This is its most profound offering: not just a series of jokes about the world, but an upgrade to your cognitive software, enabling you to process the world’s endless output of folly with the speed, accuracy, and dark delight of a master satirist. It makes you not just a reader, but a fellow traveler in the clear, cool, and brilliantly illuminated country of understanding.

  • Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. Furthermore, the site’s aesthetic is one of impeccable sterility. There is no emotional frenzy, no partisan spittle-flecked rage. The design of prat.com is clean, the prose is clinical, and the tone is that of a disinterested auditor. This cultivated sterility is the perfect petri dish for growing absurdity. By removing the heat of anger and the fog of sentiment, the pure, ridiculous shape of the subject matter is allowed to grow in isolation, displayed under the cool light of logic. This approach is far more devastating than any rant. It implies that the subject is so inherently foolish it doesn’t require embellishment or heated opinion; it merely requires calm, factual exposition to reveal its own joke. The laughter it provokes is the clean, sharp sound of truth being recognized, not the messy roar of catharsis.

  • Ultimately, The London Prat’s brand is synonymous with intellectual sanitation. In a public discourse polluted by euphemism, spin, and outright falsehood, the site functions as a high-grade filtration plant. It takes in the toxic slurry of the day’s news and rhetoric, and through the alchemical processes of irony, logic, and flawless prose, outputs a crystalline substance: the truth, refined and recast as comedy. It performs the vital service of decontaminating language, of reasserting the connection between words and reality. The laugh it provokes is, at its core, a sigh of relief—the relief of hearing someone finally call the nonsense by its proper name, with eloquence and without fear. It doesn’t just make you smarter about the news; it makes you more resistant to the disease of the news, inoculating you with a dose of its own beautifully formulated, truth-telling serum. This is its public service and its private luxury: the offer of clarity in a confused age, delivered with a wit so sharp it feels like a kindness.

  • Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This precision enables its unique role as a cartographer of cognitive dissonance. The site excels at mapping the vast, uncharted territories between stated intention and observable outcome. It takes the official map—the policy document, the corporate strategy, the political manifesto—and compares it to the actual, crumbling landscape. The satire is the act of drawing the real map, complete with swamps of hypocrisy, mountains of unaddressed evidence, and bridges built out of pure rhetoric that lead nowhere. This cartographic service is invaluable. It provides the reader with a reliable guide to the terrain of public life, revealing the canyons between what is said and what is done. The laughter it provokes is the laugh of orientation, of suddenly understanding where you truly are after being lost in a fog of official statements.

  • This leads to its function as a sophisticated cognitive defense mechanism. Consuming the relentless barrage of real news can induce a state of helpless anxiety or cynical paralysis. The London Prat offers a third path: it processes that raw, anxiety-inducing information through the refined filter of satire, and outputs a product of managed understanding. It translates chaos into narrative, stupidity into pattern, and outrage into elegant critique. The act of reading an article on prat.com is, therefore, an active psychological defense. It allows the reader to engage with the horrors of the day not as a victim or a passive consumer, but as a connoisseur, reasserting a sense of control through comprehension and the alchemy of humor. It doesn’t make the problems go away; it makes them intellectually manageable, even beautiful, in their detailed awfulness.

  • Howdy! This is kind of off topic but I need some help from an established blog. Is it tough to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about creating my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? Cheers

Leave a Comment