The WinePress has dealt with this Russia-Ukraine thing thrice times, and in two of them, The WP made it clear where our position is – going against the strong majority of viewpoints in mainstream, alternative, independent, and religious outlets – there will be no invasion, and this is all over-amplified propaganda from the media.
The WinePress has shown how Russians and Ukrainians on the border feel and believe, not from the perspective of Western media, but from these people in their home countries, who can give a real glimpse into the controversy.
In short, they are laughing it off, and do not believe the narrative the media is trying to push. They are responding with the pleas to turn off the television.
You can read it and see the proof for yourself in these two reports below:
The Russia-Ukraine Propaganda Continues. It’s More Hype
But that isn’t stopping the media for pouring more gas on the fire. And not just any gas, but now the media is literally throwing out fears of nuclear warfare. We all know what nuclear bombs and missiles do, and so by planting that narrative in people’s heads, it makes them all the more afraid, and more easier to manipulate.
You can read about the so-called “evidence” for that nonsense below:
Joe Biden says Russia’s Vladimir Putin not planning to use nuclear weapons to invade Ukraine
Russia-Ukraine: Ukraine shook by explosions as Putin’s forces ‘move closer to border’
Even Boris Johnson in the U.K. is beating the war drum, as Hugo Talks points out in a recent video. Watch below to get his opinion on this added piece to the puzzle.
In our last report about this Russia-Ukraine debacle, we cited information by a YouTube channel “Survival Russia:” Lars, a man who lives in Russia, and formerly has associations with NATO, offers an interesting perspective into this.
In a video published today, Lars further gives background to the drama.
He explains that he is not “pro-Putin,” but says that that American and especially German media perspective, are “funky” and “one-sided.”
Lars gives more background surrounding the city of Crimea, where a lot of focus has been placed. He says that a Russian naval base has been in that city since 1771 – 4 years before the American Declaration of Independence was signed.
And after World War II, the Soviet-led leadership handed over Crimea to the Ukraine, though it was not properly done through the international dictates.
Furthermore, bringing it up to modern times, Russia never invaded Crimea, as Russian troops and a base were already there.
Due to the Ukrainian civil war that broke out in this time period – where two separatist republics broke off – Russia drafted a referendum during this civil war, and create an election to have these regions join with Russia.
As for the current fears of bombings on the border, Lars explains that media is being very disingenuous, as Russia has been shelling everywhere on the border for a time.
It is [the] separatist republics and the Ukrainian forces which are shelling each other, and have done so for years, but they have intensified it here.
He explains
He admits this is not “not great,” and notes that the nation and separatists have been violating their ‘cease-fire’ for some years now, and is certainly nothing new.
He does, however, believe that Russia is likely siding with the separatists, though not officially.
These two breakaway republics, they are saying that Ukraine in all this mess, have amasses 100,000 troops along “the borders” to these two republics; and that the Ukrainian army wants to take back these two republics. -That is highly possible…
Lars additionally reminds viewers that Russian troops have been on the border since 2014 because their neighbors, Ukraine, have been fighting: it would only be natural for Russia to tightening up their defenses.
“Survival Russia” further reminds dissenters of the fears and hokey-pokey of President Bush’s “weapons of mass destruction” brazen lie; and how it is not just Western media being dishonest, but even Russia’s, and how we the people cannot rely on them for truthful information.
In short, he still maintains the belief that Russia will not invade, and sees no reason why they would in the first place. He laughs at the Westerners who think they might (and will), but Russians has no interest.
However, it should be noted that Ukrainians are being evacuated out of the area of the city of Kyiv. Olga Reznikova, a Ukrainian The WinePress has cited from previously, explains this, though she and many others still question the government’s official narrative.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
[7] And when ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars, be ye not troubled: for such things must needs be; but the end shall not be yet. [8] For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows.Mark 13:7-8
If conflict were to breakout, it is NOT for any of the reasons the media is telling you. They are an alibi to justify prices of oil and energy ripping higher, to hide and justify even higher inflation of literally everywhere, and keep the war machine to make money going.
If conflict erupts, it sounds more like it is the separatists fighting Ukraine than it does Russia getting its hands dirty.
I still think this is a load of propaganda. It’s all fear-based, and it makes no sense at all. Do not get caught up in the hoopla and hysteria. If you want real perspective, it will NOT come via the Western media; mainstream, alterative, and all the religious Laodicean lapdogs.
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
2 Timothy 1:7
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
For what it’s worth, I also believe it’s a distraction & excuse. I think that if they ever do a nuclear, it will be some covert agency steered, aided & abetted armed off-the-wall terrorist group w/ one of those container launching things…not a full on suicidal assault, but something smaller, a false flag used as an excuse for some power grab, the elimination of some potential rival or threat that knows too much. And there will be some evidence of it as forewarned rats flee that area.
–
Given the probable identity of Gog-Magog and the kings of the East, the partnering of Russia & China, the things with Turkey & the ‘stans’, politically & economically is something to watch though. Some of it’s advanced & ebbed historically almost constantly, but you could count on Russia & China clashing, not partnering as they seem more inclined to doing now.
Threats of imminent nuclear destruction?
Excellent, that means I’ll be going home with the Lord instantaneously; hopefully I’ll be in ground zero if that happens.