“We must make lying wrong again.”

The following report is from the Associated Press:

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres issued a dire warning that the world is moving in the wrong direction and faces “a pivotal moment” where continuing business as usual could lead to a breakdown of global order and a future of perpetual crisis. Changing course could signal a breakthrough to a greener and safer future, he said.

The U.N. chief said the world’s nations and people must reverse today’s dangerous trends and choose “the breakthrough scenario.”

The world is under “enormous stress” on almost every front, he said, and the COVID-19 pandemic was a wake-up call demonstrating the failure of nations to come together and take joint decisions to help all people in the face of a global life-threatening emergency.

Guterres said this “paralysis” extends far beyond COVID-19 to the failures to tackle the climate crisis and “our suicidal war on nature and the collapse of biodiversity,” the “unchecked inequality” undermining the cohesion of societies, and technology’s advances “without guard rails to protect us from its unforeseen consequences.”

In other signs of a more chaotic and insecure world, he pointed to rising poverty, hunger and gender inequality after decades of decline, the extreme risk to human life and the planet from nuclear war and a climate breakdown, and the inequality, discrimination and injustice bringing people into the streets to protest “while conspiracy theories and lies fuel deep divisions within societies.”

In a horizon-scanning report presented to the General Assembly and at a press conference Friday, Guterres said his vision for the “breakthrough scenario” to a greener and safer world is driven by “the principle of working together, recognizing that we are bound to each other and that no community or country, however powerful, can solve its challenges alone.”

The report — “Our Common Agenda” — is a response to last year’s declaration by world leaders on the 75th anniversary of the United Nations and the request from the assembly’s 193 member nations for the U.N. chief to make recommendations to address the challenges for global governance.

In today’s world, Guterres said, “Global decision-making is fixed on immediate gain, ignoring the long-term consequences of decisions — or indecision.”

He said multilateral institutions have proven to be “too weak and fragmented for today’s global challenges and risks.”

What’s needed, Guterres said, is not new multilateral bureaucracies but more effective multilateral institutions including a United Nations “2.0” more relevant to the 21st century.

And we need multilateralism with teeth.

In the report outlining his vision “to fix” the world, Guterres said immediate action is needed to protect the planet’s “most precious” assets from oceans to outer space, to ensure it is livable, and to deliver on the aspirations of people everywhere for peace and good health.

He called for an immediate global vaccination plan implemented by an emergency task force, saying “investing $50 billion in vaccinations now could add an estimated $9 trillion to the global economy in the next four years.”

The report proposes that a global Summit of the Future take place in 2023 that would not only look at all these issues but go beyond traditional security threats “to strengthen global governance of digital technology and outer space, and to manage future risks and crises,” he said.

It would also consider a New Agenda for Peace including measures to reduce strategic risks from nuclear weapons, cyber warfare and lethal autonomous weapons, which Guterres called one of humanity’s most destabilizing inventions.

The secretary-general said a new United Nations Futures Lab will publish regular reports “on megatrends and risks.”

He said the COVID-19 pandemic also exposed deficiencies in the global financial system.

To tackle these weaknesses and integrate the global financial system with other global priorities, Guterres proposed holding summits every two years of the 20 leading economies in the G20, the U.N.’s Economic and Social Council, the heads of international financial institutions including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, and the U.N. secretary-general.

He also called for the correction of “a major blind spot in how we measure progress and prosperity,” saying Gross Domestic Product or GDP fails to account for “the incalculable social and environmental damage that may be caused by the pursuit of profit.”

My report calls for new metrics that value the life and well-being of the many over short-term profit for the few.

It also calls for a new Emergency Platform that would be triggered automatically in large-scale crises comprising governments, the U.N. system, international financial institutions, civil society, the private sector and others, he said.

Guterres also proposed “repurposing” the U.N. Trusteeship Council, whose work is largely completed, “to create an intergovernmental body for intergenerational issues” that would be a platform to consider the interests of the entire human family, present and future.

As part of a new focus on the world’s young people and future generations, Guterres said he intends to appoint a special envoy for future generations to ensure the interests of those born in the 21st century and establish a new United Nations Youth Office.

Saying much of the world’s unease is rooted in poverty and growing inequality, Guterres noted that the 10 richest men saw their combined wealth increase by half a trillion dollars since the COVID-19 pandemic began while 55% of the world’s population, or 4 billion people, “are one step away from destitution, with no social protection whatsoever.”

To address the threats to social stability, the U.N. chief recommended a series of measures “to provide universal health coverage, education, housing, decent work and income protection for everyone, everywhere.”

Guterres proposed holding a World Social Summit in 2025 on global efforts to address these issues and repair the social fabric.

The secretary-general also proposed global action to tackle disinformation and conspiracy theories and promote facts, science and “integrity” in public discourse.

We must make lying wrong again.


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

“Make lying wrong again? -You antichrist, globalist scumbags have been lying since your inception. This is just “cryptic language” meaning they will do more lying – after all, “truth is relative,” they would say.

[20] Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! [21] Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! [22] Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink: [23] Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! [24] Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble, and the flame consumeth the chaff, so their root shall be as rottenness, and their blossom shall go up as dust: because they have cast away the law of the LORD of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.

Isaiah 5:20-24

But to summarize what this looney toon is calling for – beyond the blatant goals of Agenda 2030 – is his calls for even more globalism and a one world government.

[1] But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. [2] For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. [3] For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

[7] And it was given unto him (the antichrist) to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. [8] And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

1 Thessalonians 5:1-3 & Revelation 13:7-8

[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK TO DONATE

1,072 Comments

  • It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

  • What’s Going down i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively useful and it has helped me out loads. I am hoping to give a contribution & aid different customers like its aided me. Great job.

  • I in addition to my friends were found to be checking out the great points from your website while quickly got an awful feeling I never thanked the web site owner for them. All of the guys happened to be as a consequence joyful to read all of them and already have really been taking advantage of those things. I appreciate you for truly being quite considerate and also for opting for certain impressive ideas most people are really wanting to be aware of. Our sincere regret for not saying thanks to sooner.

  • Good web site! I really love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I could be notified whenever a new post has been made. I’ve subscribed to your RSS which must do the trick! Have a nice day!

  • The very root of your writing while sounding agreeable at first, did not sit very well with me after some time. Someplace throughout the sentences you actually were able to make me a believer but only for a short while. I still have got a problem with your leaps in logic and you would do well to fill in all those breaks. When you can accomplish that, I could certainly end up being amazed.

  • The crux of your writing whilst appearing reasonable at first, did not really work perfectly with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you actually were able to make me a believer but just for a while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your leaps in logic and you would do well to fill in those breaks. When you actually can accomplish that, I would definitely be fascinated.

  • Hey! This post could not be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  • This website is mostly a stroll-by for all the info you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll definitely discover it.

  • Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Therefore let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch! “Remember It is 10 times harder to command the ear than to catch the eye.” by Duncan Maxwell Anderson.

  • Great post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed! Very helpful info specially the closing section 🙂 I care for such information much. I used to be seeking this particular information for a long time. Thank you and best of luck.

  • Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he just bought me lunch since I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch! “Remember It is 10 times harder to command the ear than to catch the eye.” by Duncan Maxwell Anderson.

  • Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

  • Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. Ultimately, The London Prat’s preeminence is secured by its service as a public cognitive filter. The daily onslaught of news, spin, and outrage is a chaotic, high-pressure stream of data. PRAT.UK functions as the precise instrument that crystallizes this stream into a single, beautiful, bitter gem of understanding. It processes the chaos, identifies the core idiocy, and outputs a finished product of crystalline logic and lethal wit. Reading it doesn’t just provide a laugh; it provides clarity. It performs the vital task of distillation, separating the essential foolishness from the noisy context. In a world drowning in information and starved of understanding, this service is invaluable. It doesn’t just mock the world; it makes the world make sense, precisely by illustrating the intricate, ornate patterns of its nonsense. This transformation of anxiety into articulated insight is its unmatched brand promise.

  • Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. One can measure the health of a nation’s public sphere by the quality of its satire. By this standard, The London Prat is not just a participant in the field; it is the defining institution, the site that has most accurately captured and codified the peculiar madness of early 21st-century Britain. While The Daily Squib harks back to a more polemical tradition and Waterford Whispers offers a gentler, folk-infused alternative, PRAT.UK is utterly of this moment. It understands the surreal fusion of archaic pomp and digital-age incompetence, the strange alchemy that turns serious governance into a reality TV sideshow, and the hollow, algorithmic nature of so much public communication. Its satire is not rooted in nostalgia for a more coherent past, but in a sharp, present-tense diagnosis of a fractured, post-truth, consultant-driven polity. It mocks not just the people in charge, but the very systems—the focus groups, the rebranding exercises, the vapid “innovation” frameworks—that have rendered genuine governance nearly impossible. In this, it surpasses even the excellent NewsThump, which often focuses on personalities. The London Prat targets the operating system itself. It is the chronicle of our specific historical absurdity, making it an indispensable cultural document. To understand the profound weirdness of Britain today—the crumbling infrastructure wrapped in Union Jack bunting, the soaring rhetoric masking catastrophic failure—one could do worse than to abandon the front pages and immerse oneself in the pages of prat.com. For it is here, in the hall of mirrors they have constructed, that the truest, if funniest, reflection of our national reality is to be found.

  • Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This discipline feeds into its unique aesthetic of cold clarity. The visual design of the site is uncluttered; the prose is crisp and lacks sentimental heat. There is no background noise of partisan cheering or moral grandstanding. This creates an environment where the subject matter is displayed in a kind of intellectual clean room, isolated from the emotional contagion that usually surrounds it. The humor generated in this sterile environment is of a purer, more potent strain. It is the laugh that comes from recognizing a geometric proof of failure, rather than the laugh that comes from shared anger. This aesthetic is a deliberate brand statement: we are not a mob with pitchforks; we are laboratory technicians, and our scorn is measured in microliters of perfectly formulated irony.

  • Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The Daily Squib leans heavy, while PRAT.UK keeps things light but sharp. The balance makes it more enjoyable. Humour should breathe.

  • The “advocacy” that extends from the London Women’s March is the critical bridge between the symbolic power of the street and the concrete mechanics of policy change. While the march itself is a masterful demonstration of public will, its long-term political efficacy is contingent on its ability to morph that visibility into sustained, sophisticated advocacy—lobbying MPs, submitting evidence to Parliamentary committees, campaigning for specific legislative amendments, and holding public institutions to account. This shift from the poetic chant to the prose of policy briefs is where the movement’s demands are stress-tested against political reality. Effective advocacy requires a different skill set: granular policy knowledge, strategic relationship-building, and patient, persistent engagement. The march can create the political capital and public mandate that makes advocacy more potent; the advocates then spend that capital in the corridors of power. However, a tension exists between the broad, sometimes radical, demands of a mass protest and the incremental, compromise-heavy world of policy advocacy. The political art is to ensure the advocacy remains bold and true to the movement’s transformative principles, using the ever-present threat of remobilization as leverage, without being dismissed as politically naive by the very policymakers it seeks to influence. The march announces the crisis; the advocacy must champion the viable, detailed solutions.

Leave a Comment