CDC Quietly Gets Rid Of PCR Testing Admitting They Can’t Tell The Difference Between Covid And The Flu

On July 21st, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention put out a quiet laboratory alert, updating their protocols regarding the usage of the PCR tests used to test for Covid-19 infections and cases.

According to the update posted on their website, after December 31st, 2021, the CDC “will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel,” a protocol that was introduced in February of 2020 to diagnose Covid-19 infections.

The alert states they are giving this advanced warning so clinical laboratories have ample time to “select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

The update provides links to the FDA’s website, with a list of different testing types to choose from, and another link showing the documented performance data of these tests.

The CDC’s update concludes by asking clinicians to transition into a different FDA approved test for Covid-19, one that can detect the differences between Covid-19 and influenza.

[The] CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season.

Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.

Documented Inaccuracies

It has been reported by many doctors, medical institutions, the media, and even Dr. Fauci himself, admitting that the PCR tests are flawed and can misrepresent the data.

What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard [is that] if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule.

It’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians [when] somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it’s like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle.

So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.

Dr. Anthony Fauci

You can hear Fauci’s remarks on the PCR test in the podcast below, posted on July 17th, 2020.

Or on January 4th, 2021, the FDA also posted an article titled “Risk of False Results with the Curative SARS-Cov-2 Test for COVID-19: FDA Safety Communication,” which states:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is alerting patients and health care providers of the risk of false results, particularly false negative results, with the Curative SARS-Cov-2 test. Risks to a patient of a false negative result include: delayed or lack of supportive treatment, lack of monitoring of infected individuals and their household or other close contacts for symptoms resulting in increased risk of spread of COVID-19 within the community, or other unintended adverse events.

But this information has long since been known and available, long before the pandemonium that set in, in 2020, as documented in The WinePress’ comprehensive document detailing the many facts surrounding Covid-19.

The inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, who knew and worked with Dr. Fauci at the time – who was also an open critic of him – stated this about his own test in the 1990’s:

With PCR if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else, right? Because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body.

PCR is separate from that, it’s just a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.

In short, the PCR test was never designed to test and look for acute illnesses, which is what a coronavirus is. What the PCR is designed to register is RNA patterns and look for chronic disease. However, as noted by Mullis and many other reports in the media (as documented in our comprehensive report on Covid) the threshold cycles can be adjusted to seemingly find anything the user wants to make it say.

As also noted in our reports, The WinePress cited an official CDC document titled “CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel,” with an effective date of July 13th, 2020.

Page three of that document admits that the PCR tests do not automatically assume a Covid-19 positive infection, and can be misinterpreted as something else.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection with SARS-CoV-2 but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.

Negative results do not preclude SARS-CoV-2 infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Negative results must be combined with clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information.

Page 3 of the document

Furthermore, that same document on Page 39 states an important detail, that, still to this day is so often ignored and unknown to many, is that the virus has yet to have been isolated.

The analytical sensitivity of the RT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.

This little known and admitted fact was also cited in a report in a 2020 New England Medicine Journal of Medicine titled “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019,” where they noted that Covid-19 fails Nobel Prize winner Robert Koch’s postulates, which are the basics of virology, which are:

1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.
3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must cause disease.
4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.

So, regardless if the CDC tells clinicians to transition away from the PCR tests, a non-isolated virus will continue to lead to inaccurate results – such as a cup of Coca-Cola testing positive for the virus, as reported by The WinePress.

However, with the CDC stating that medical practitioners need to transition away from the PCR test to differentiate the flu, confirms other reports that influenza cases have been significantly down and virtually unreported – which is translated in the Covid infection data, as again reported in our detailed PDF concerning Covid.

---

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

A wicked messenger falleth into mischief: but a faithful ambassador is health.

Proverbs 13:17

‘Nothing to see here, ladies and gents:’ just stay scared and it constant paranoia and have your life turned on its axis, while we ruin your life.’

[1] He, that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy. [2] When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.

Proverbs 29:1-2

There’s no cure, a remedy, for willful ignorance and denial of facts and reality. The evidence is clear and in everyone’s face, and yet the masses still continue to buy into the lies.

This is why, for example, I will continue to stand against the lab-leak theory that is often regurgitated by conservative media. How can it be when it has never been isolated? As I have explained before, the lab-leak theory would only work if the independent labs, universities, and hospitals did not isolate the virus themselves; and if they did, are you telling me there is a massive conspiracy that every single health practitioner in that field has been sworn to secrecy? I highly doubt that. But by keeping the lab-leak theory in constant circulation in the media, it still keeps just enough fear, animosity, and concern that the virus might be dangerous to anyone that does get it, or the unknowns of it replicating and mutating into different variants – which is what Fox News is really pushing hard now.

Sean Hannity Urges Viewers To Get Vaccinated. Fox Implements Their Own Version Of A Passport

Fox News Defends Fauci And Says He’s A Good Doctor. Other Republicans Urge Vaccination

For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

2 Timothy 1:7

Nevertheless, here is yet another piece of evidence proving that this pandemonium, not a pandemic, as a whole is a 100% sham.

Be sure to share this data with those that still have ears to hear, and perhaps a vaccination surge team if they come to your door.

Vaccine Surge Teams Begin Rolling Out Around The Country But With Actual Vaccines

Government Documents Reveal How Some Of America’s Vaccine “Surge Teams” Will Operate

---

[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK TO DONATE