Why Is The AstraZeneca Vaccine Causing Blood Clots?

Today it was announced that the AstraZeneca vaccine is seeking emergency approval in the U.S. Even though almost two dozen nations have suspended the vaccine’s use, America is still embracing its rollout.

According to a CBSN report, the AstraZeneca vaccine is reported to be 79% effective at preventing symptoms attributed to Covid-19 from recent trials. It is also claimed that the vaccine will prevent 100% severe cases and hospitalizations. 300 million doses have been preordered by the U.S. and are expected to ready for distribution in early May.

The report also shared their fears of the possible transmission of the virus in the midst of spring-breakers in Miami causing a ruckus and resisting curfew mandates.

However, absent from this particular report has been numerous cases of severe blood clotting occurring in this particular vaccine.

On March 8th The WinePress did its first direct report against the deaths that started to arise soon after the AstraZeneca vaccine was administered to a couple of nurses. In that report, we listed the reported ingredients used for this vaccine.

One of these ingredients is Polysorbate 80. A simple internet search reveals that Polysorbate 80 has been reported to lead to all kinds of adverse reactions and known effects.

One report from the NIH confirms this. We have highlighted of few points to take note of.

Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate (polysorbate 80, Tween 80), a surfactant, has been widely used as a solvent for pharmacological experiments. In the present study, polysorbate 80 was found to have toxicity of a low order in both the mice and rats when given by i.p. and p.o. routes. It produced mild to moderate depression of the central nervous system with a marked reduction in locomotor activity and rectal temperature, exhibited ataxia and paralytic activity and potentiated the pentobarbital sleeping time. On intravenous administration in dogs, it had a dose-dependent hypotensive effect. Polysorbate 80 did not have a direct stimulant or relaxant effect on either guinea pig ileum or rat uterus, however, it antagonised the contractions induced by acetylcholine, histamine, barium, 5-hydroxytryptamine and carbachol in a dose-dependent manner. A direct relaxant effect was observed on rabbit jejunum. A dose-dependent myocardial depressant effect was observed on guinea pig and rabbit paired atrial preparations. On the electrically-driven guinea pig left atrial preparation, polysorbate 80 exhibited a dose-dependent negative inotropic action. Polysorbate 80 did not induce diuresis in rats upto a dose of 2.5 ml/kg. The results of the present study indicate that polysorbate 80 can neither be used as a solvent for isolated tissue experiments nor when considered for intravenous administration. However, polysorbate 80 can be employed safely as a vehicle for neuropsychopharmacological experiments in doses not exceeding 1 ml/kg.

The NIH’s website does not record how many milliliters of Polysorbate 80 is in the vaccine, but it is apparently enough to cause the problems it has been.

Another report confirms the dangerous effects of this chemical. The Good Human did a piece years ago explaining the dangers of this chemical. Though we could not see a date as to when this report was posted, there are comments that date back to 2013.

Polysorbate 80 is not just limited to vaccines and other pharmaceuticals: it can be found in gelatins, vitamins, some ice cream brands, gum, condiments, soaps and shampoos, and cosmetics.

The Good Human notes that the Material Safety Data Sheet lists this chemical with the following traits and effects:

• Slightly flammable to flammable in presence of heat
• Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation.
• May cause adverse reproductive effects based on animal test data. No human data found.
• May cause cancer based on animal test data. No human data found.
• May affect genetic material (mutagenic)

It’s also mentioned the handbook of green chemicals.

They also note that this chemical is hidden behind other names such as Alkest, Canarcel and Tween.

Here are some of study results show concerning this chemical – the following is from The Good Human:

Some cosmetic grade Polysorbate 80 may potentially contain ethylene oxide, 1,4-dioxane and mono- and diethylene glycol as impurities, although worryingly these carcinogenic contaminants have also been picked up in food additives.

The report on Skin Deep gives Polysorbate a moderate hazard, with a 3/10 rating, but the contaminants ethylene oxide and 1,4-dioxane have ratings as a high hazard (8/10 and 10/10).

Generally, the cosmetic grade Polysorbate 80 is more likely to contain these impurities. Some natural cosmetics manufacturers are very careful about the quality that they use, and stick to only the food grade Polysorbate 80.

This study suggests a link between the ingredient and infertility in mice.

The relative weight of the uterus and ovaries was decreased relative to the untreated controls. ….. Ovaries were without corpora lutea, and had degenerative follicles.

It was seen to accelerate the maturation of female rats and resulted in deformities of the ovary. These effects were demonstrated in newborn mice which were injected with Polysorbate 80. It is certainly a concern when we consider that some vaccines may contain Polysorbate 80.

A separate study suggested that Polysorbate 80 could be a causative agent of a pregnant woman going into anaphylactic shock.

While this is also a worry, I would choose to be wary of this study as research was conducted on just one pregnant woman who had a severe allergic reaction to a multivitamin administered via IV. While doctors identified Polysorbate 80 as the cause, no other incidences of this type of reaction have been reported.

A recent study has shown a real connection between ingesting Polysorbate 80 and the development of bowel problems – it could be a real worry for those with a predisposition to Colitis.

Relatively low concentrations of two commonly used emulsifiers, namely carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80, induced low-grade inflammation and obesity/metabolic syndrome in wild-type hosts and promoted robust colitis in mice predisposed to this disorder….These results support the emerging concept that perturbed host–microbiota interactions resulting in low-grade inflammation can promote adiposity and its associated metabolic effects. Moreover, they suggest that the broad use of emulsifying agents might be contributing to an increased societal incidence of obesity/metabolic syndrome and other chronic inflammatory diseases.

In a similar vein, the study linked here connected Polysorbate 80 to exacerbated Crohn’s Disease.

Crohn’s disease is common in developed nations where the typical diet is low in fibre and high in processed food. Primary lesions overlie Peyer’s patches and colonic lymphoid follicles where bacterial invasion through M-cells occurs. We have assessed the effect of soluble non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) and food emulsifiers on translocation of Escherichia coli across M-cells.

Translocation of E coli across M-cells is reduced by soluble plant fibres, particularly plantain and broccoli, but increased by the emulsifier Polysorbate-80. These effects occur at relevant concentrations and may contribute to the impact of dietary factors on Crohn’s disease pathogenesis.

Polysorbate 80 has also been causally linked with an increased risk of blood clots, stroke, heart attack, heart failure, and of tumor growth or recurrence in patients with certain types of cancer .

---

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

[20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

1 Timothy 6:20-21

And yet these vaccines are continually propagandized and shoved in our faces on a daily basis. I mean, get real folks, you accept me to take these vaccines and pharmaceuticals to make me healthy? Fat chance that is happening. No way. These things, like all other vaccines and drugs that big pharma produces, are toxic and will do more harm than any kind of good. And do not think for a second the manufacturers and distributors of these vaccines don’t know they are highly toxic. But do they care? Obviously not.

[9] But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. [10] For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. [11] But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.

1 Timothy 6:9-11

I’d also like to note a couple of things from the CBS fear report. They reported that 300 million doses have been ordered. America has a population of 332,420,000. If we already have hundreds of millions of doses ordered and available from the other vaccine companies, why do we need so many? Are they planning to vaccinate the newborns in the following years? Let us know what you think in the comments.

The doctor also being interviewed in that report also said that over 500 million died. I think that was a slip of the tongue and meant 500 thousand; but hey, it’s the mainstream media: since when are they honest or accurate?

---

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK TO DONATE