The following report is from the Trends Journal:
Brussels faces a lawsuit from E.U. member states accusing it of favoring pro-nuclear and pro-gas countries after moving to include natural gas and nuclear energy as forms of green energy.
The Financial Times reported that the designation came in its “taxonomy for sustainable finance” paper, which aims to point private companies and capital to activities considered to be environmentally sustainable.
The 27 countries that make up the European Union have disagreements on how nuclear power and natural gas can be considered “green.”
Mairead McGuinness, the E.U. commissioner for financial services, admitted that the unrevised final text could be imperfect, “but it’s a real solution that moves us forward towards our ultimate goal of climate neutrality.”
The taxonomy does not mandate investment in certain sectors. It does not prohibit investment in sectors covered. It is a signpost towards the private investment market.
The report said new nuclear power stations will be able to qualify for the green label prior to 2045 if countries are able to lay out how they will be able to handle waste management and decommissioning. Both nuclear and natural gas could be classified as a “sustainable investment” if they meet targets that have been put in place.
One of the key debates hinges on what to do with nuclear waste produced in these nuclear power plants. The U.K. government is looking for a location to bury more than 50 years’ worth of toxic nuclear waste about half a mile underground.
The FT reported that the boroughs of Allerdale and Copeland in Cumbria are potential sites. The report last week said this is the fourth attempt by the government to find a location for the waste. The report said any location will have to store the waste for 100,000 years before it reaches safe levels.
The U.K. has plans for more nuclear plants with the aim of reducing its carbon emissions. The U.K. already relies on nuclear energy for 17 percent of its electricity.
If you were sat right on top of one of those [high-level waste] containers you would be dead within several hours.
Dr. Claire Corkhill, an expert on underground nuclear waste storage, told the paper.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has said the best storage for the waste is in geological disposal facilities, which would be placed in metal or concrete containers and sealed permanently in vaults hundreds of yards below solid rock, the paper reported.
I cannot understand the decision of the E.U.
Karl Nehammer, Austria’s chancellor, said, according to the BBC.
The report said that he plans legal action if the guidance goes forward. Luxembourg has also said it will join legal action, the report said. France, which is a country that relies on nuclear power, has supported the decision.
The BBC report pointed out that the E.U. was not requiring any member state to take action, but the “E.U. Taxonomy” was just intended to show private investors how to invest in green initiatives.
Critics have called the classification system “greenwashing,” which is considered a symbolic gesture in order to create a misleading pro-environmental image. The report said the labels have not been finalized. Green parties have also been vocal critics of the plans.
TREND FORECAST: As we have forecast, it will be a long haul before the world goes “Green.” There will not be a fast move to alternative energies until new ones that are affordable, efficient and truly “sustainable,” are invented.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
Revelation 11:18
The fact that nuclear energy as a means for sustainable clean energy, passes through the lips of these “greenies” and eco-warriors, demonstrates that they (again) are clueless as to what it means to reverse pollution, and how they have been mind-controlled into believing a globalist agenda.
As I often bring up, no one ever seems to discuss just the sheer amount of dirty energy that will be required to just make these technologies and systems.
Moreover, the media and activists do not want you to remember the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima nuclear meltdowns and atrocities, that clearly demonstrate just how toxic this stuff is. Or how about China? Have you seen them lately: the thick dark clouds, acid rain, dead nature, millions dying annually due to air pollution?
Air Pollution Kills 3.5X More Than Covid-19
Simply put: if you want to reduce toxicity and pollution, we must cease the current setup, and go back to what worked before!
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
Jeremiah 6:16
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
The benefit of fisson nuclear power is there no carbon emissions. Just waste heat and steam/water evapor.
The biggest problem with current nuclear fission plants is the waste and the hazard of there being a catastrophe when the plant goes down. There is boron rods (also know as kill rods) that are put into the reactor water to control or ‘kill’ the nuclear reaction. The biggest problem is the waste or spent used fuel pools to keep waste cool until they are ready to go into dry storage.
If the spent fuel pool motor to circulate the water fails, then the water separates and turns into hydrogen. Which blows up the spent fuel rod building and then the fuel rods melt down.
The other problem is you have spent fuel in storage spread throughout the US. Yucca Mountain in Nevada was supposed to be the answer to store it all in one place but that never came to fruitation.
Just found out that Sam Brinton has been assigned to deputy assistant secretary of spent fuel and waste disposition in the Office of Nuclear Energy for the Department of Energy.
Interesting individual to say the least:
https://lgbtqreligiousarchives.org/profiles/sam-brinton
https://samuelbrinton.com/
I would post other links but they are a bit over the top with the LGBT and sexual perversion that is shown online.