“My worry is that all a booster might do is just prevent asymptomatic or mild symptomatic breakthrough cases in people whose immune systems would get the disease under control in a few days anyway, thus not affecting health outcomes in a meaningful way.”

Booster shots have become one of the major talking points amidst the ever-evolving Covid saga. Now that more reports are noting that the fully vaccinated are still testing positive, the studies stating that the vaccines were not as effective as they were originally touted, and that the CDC’s Walensky told CNN that the vaccinated can still transmit the virus – the move towards boosters begins.

Fauci Now Says Booster Shots Are ‘Inevitable’ And Will Be Necessary For Everyone

The CDC And FDA Contradict Pfizer’s Statements That An Additional Booster Shot Will Be Needed

Just recently pharmaceutical store giants CVS and Walgreens have begun administering a third shot.

The CDC was scheduled to discuss the official advisement to administer booster shots, but talks have been postponed to August 30th. The current plan is to have boosters rollout by September 20th.

One doctor is speaking out, and questioning the need for boosters, according to a report by Bloomberg.

This is what is really concerning to many of us. Because it feels like the scientific process is being short circuited by political concerns… It is almost science by popular demand.

There is a bit of looking into a crystal ball and jumping to conclusions that we just don’t have the data for yet.

Celine Gounder, an infectious disease specialist at Bellevue Hospital in New York.

Gounder is in support of giving a booster shot to the very elderly and nursing home residents, but feels the data for a broad rollout would be beneficial.

Another healthcare practitioner also questions the use of boosters.

From a population level it, it doesn’t help us in controlling the pandemic. The math doesn’t work.

Ellie Murray, a Boston University School of Public Health epidemiologist

She believes that higher vaccination rates are needed in order to attempt to lower transmission levels, and boosters will not solve the problem, unless more people get vaccinated in general.

‘Giving boosters in states where vaccination rates are high will make no difference in the more hesitant states, said Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease doctor at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. The focus should lowering hospitalizations, which vaccines still do quite well, not in preventing every last mild breakthrough case, he said,’ according to the Bloomberg report.

If we give everybody third doses now. Mississippi will still be hellish.

My worry is that all a booster might do is just prevent asymptomatic or mild symptomatic breakthrough cases in people whose immune systems would get the disease under control in a few days anyway, thus not affecting health outcomes in a meaningful way.

Jeffrey Morris, a biostatistician at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine

The Bloomberg report further notes that obtaining more booster shots will cost more money. Furthermore, the report also says that while the mRNA Pfizer and Moderna vaccines increase coronavirus antibodies in the bloodstream, they do not improve prevention. The White House is still gathering data on the Johnson & Johnson jab, and will make a decision for those recipients later.

The FDA is poised to approve the vaccines within the next few days, which is something Fauci has said will lead to more localized mandates soon.


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

[20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

1 Timothy 6:20-21

Then these same doctors will be cheerleading boosters in a few weeks or so, I believe anyways. They’ll do what they are told. And it’s not like they are speaking out against the current “vaccines” for a non-isolated virus: they just want more people jabbed up regardless – with jabs that Walensky explicitly said they do not stop transmission. So how does that convince people to get vaccinated?


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK TO DONATE

2 Comments

  • I know at least one doctor who has decided this is the hill to die on, & who has determined that license revoked, fines, or jailtime : she is still not taking the shot. And, I don’t think she’s the majority, but I don’t think she’s alone either.

    • Wonderful there’s hope! Becoming a physician is definitely NOT a good idea and they’ve got debts and struggles that would make that job at Subway look like a more viable option. Doctors for the most part are shunned or regarded as people they don’t want to be around and with very good reason. I’d rather play with tarantulas than go see some doctor.
      And with this “pandemic” being a doctor has never been more depressing and arduous.
      If you’re a doctor and considering going against the big pharma monsters and medical mafia and refusing to take the death shot, DO IT! GET OUT! And also REPENT and go back to the King James Bible!

Leave a Comment

×