Canada And Australia Advise To No Longer Administer AstraZeneca Vaccine. Urges To Switch To MRNA Ones

According to a recent report from the CBC, The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) is now recommending the Canadian provinces to no longer administer the AstraZeneca (AZ) in most scenarios, even if someone has already had one of the required two doses.

Instead, the Canadian health officials are now asking AZ recipients to receive their second dose of an mRNA vaccine – Moderna or Pfier-BioNTech.

An mRNA vaccine is now preferred as the second dose for individuals who received a first dose of the AstraZeneca/COVISHIELD vaccine, based on emerging evidence of a potentially better immune response from this mixed vaccine schedule.

The NACI

‘The “mixed vaccine schedule” refers to the practice of using different products for the first and second doses,’ says the CBC report.

This new guidance comes after expert volunteer help at NACI said the AZ vaccine is not the “preferred” dose, claiming that the AZ vaccine is more related to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) – an adverse event that leads to blood clotting combined with low a platelet count.

NACI also believes that a second dose of the AZ shot can lead to greater chance of VIIT, a likelihood that “has increased over time, with current estimates of approximately 1 per 600,000 people vaccinated.”

At first, NACI told the Canadian public that they could get a AZ shot if they did not want to wait in line for the mRNA vaccines. Now that same guidance committee said Canadians should be offered the Moderna or Pfizer “should be offered to start a vaccine series, unless there is a contraindication, for example an allergy to one of the mRNA vaccine ingredients.”

NACI believes the transition to this new advisory will be smooth as Canada is expected to receives a large shipment of vaccines soon.

Since the beginning of May, all Canadian provinces put a pause on the AZ vaccine as a first dose, but still used it as a booster shot.

[People who already have had two doses of AstraZeneca] can rest assured that the vaccine provides good protection against infection and very good protection against severe disease and hospitalization

NACI said

It’s not as if there’s been a recall on this product because it’s dangerous. There isn’t anything inherently wrong with the vaccine. It’s not something evil. We’re just prioritizing the vaccines that are best suited for the current variants.

Dr. Donald Vinh, an associate professor of medicine at McGill University and an expert in microbiology and human genetics

According to NACI, new studies from Germany suggest that one dose of the AZ and one dose of the Pfizer may actually produce “a potentially better immune response, including against variants of concern” than two doses of AstraZeneca alone.”

Evidence continues to suggest a first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine followed by a second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine has a good safety profile.

NACI said

‘NACI is also now recommending that mRNA recipients receive a second shot of whatever product they received first,’ according to CBC.

Australia Is Doing The Same

Australia is also barring their AZ dose, too. Unless the patient is over 60 year of age, the Australian health officials are advising against the use of that vaccine, citing risks related to blood clots.

All across the country people are cancelling appointments or asking about whether they should even have their second dose.

It has definitely put a big barrier on the vaccine rollout.

We’re going to have to regroup and regain confidence in it, as it’s really important to keep the vaccination programme rolling out. We still have elderly people unvaccinated, and we’re seeing community transmission again.

Dr. Karen Price, president of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

The problem is that there’s a public perception that there are two vaccines – the good one and the less good one and so people are reasonably saying, ‘Well why can’t I have the good one?’

They’re also saying ‘Why am I in the group that doesn’t have access?’

Dr Todd Cameron, a Melbourne GP who runs several clinics in the city.

According to World Online News, only 3% of adults of the entire country of Australia have been vaccinated, with almost 25% in total receiving their first shot.

---

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

[15] My son, walk not thou in the way with them; refrain thy foot from their path: [16] For their feet run to evil, and make haste to shed blood. [17] Surely in vain the net is spread in the sight of any bird. [18] And they lay wait for their own blood; they lurk privily for their own lives. [19] So are the ways of every one that is greedy of gain; which taketh away the life of the owners thereof.

Proverbs 1:15-18

The WinePress has reported that many other nations have barred the AstraZeneca vaccine. Even the other one dose vector shot from J&J was temporarily stopped in the States.

That being said, these “fears” of blood clots is just hype and more smoke and mirrors. If these vaccines are being barred for those supposed reasons, then why does Moderna and Pfizer not get the same treatment? I mean, just for the United States alone: have you seen some of these entries on the official CDC VAERS system? Most people have no idea what it is or how to report adverse events and deaths, but there is still an insane number of cases and deaths listed on there, with most of them related to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

I cannot dogmatically prove this, but it seems to me that the elites want the mRNA shots because they can better program the patient to perpetually cause the body to ruin itself as the body slowly generates an autoimmune disorder – further allowing for a more timely and controlled killing.

WARNING: Covid Vaccine Recipients Will Drop Dead Over The Next Several Years

DEATHSHOT: Postmortem Study Of Vaccinated Man Reveals “Viral RNA Found In Every Organ Of The Body”

A man that doeth violence to the blood of any person shall flee to the pit; let no man stay him.

Proverbs 28:17

---

[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK TO DONATE