Green Rebel, an Indonesian-based meat alternative company, has just debuted its new meatless steak that is derived from plants. This is said to be the first of its kind for the Asian nations.
According to their website, Green Rebel describes themselves as:
Indonesia’s first plant-based meat company focusing on delicious Asian flavours. We believe that everyone can live healthily & sustainably by alternating our eating habits – without giving up loved traditions or modern convenience.
Our aim is to provide a meaty experience with high protein, no cholesterol, less saturated fat, and much less natural resources compared to animal products.
Made by chefs, food technologists, and nutritionists behind Burgreens brand, we ensure our proteins have maximum health benefits – minus the carbon footprint.
By simply replacing your usual animal product with Green Rebel foods, you are doing yourself and environment a big favor.
We are part of Burgreens Family, Indonesia’s largest plant-based eatery chain.
The company headquartered out of Indonesia’s capitol city, Jakarta, says that its Beefless Steak and Chick’n Steak are being sold at partnered restaurants such as Aduba and Pepper Lunch. They go on to state that they offer “the first whole-cut, plant-based steaks in Asia.”
Their emulated beef is made from shiitake mushroom and faux chicken is derived from soy proteins.
According to AgFunder News, ‘Formerly named Green Butcher, Green Rebel was launched last year by CEO Helga Angelina Tjahjadi and chief innovation officer Max Mandias. The pair are also co-founders of vegan food and beverage chain Burgreens, which opened its doors in 2013.’
The company also offers Asian-tasting alternatives such as their Chick’n Satay and Beefless Rendang – which some of their products are sold at some Starbucks based in Indonesia.
According to Green Rebel, its Beefless Steak and Chick’n Steak will be sold by Burgreens and other cooperating restaurants, or lower their price-points to match the animal-based items on the menu. Retail consumers will be able to purchase these foods by now and the end of the month.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
[1] Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; [2] Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; [3] Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. [4] For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: [5] For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.1 Timothy 4:1-5
Is it me, or does that “steak” look like a piece of OSB-plywood with char marks on it? Either way, it looks disgusting as it sounds.
Not only that, if you watched their short ad they put out, did you notice they said “something meaty & juicy is cooking now!” But I thought they weren’t selling meat? This is what the Bible says would happen: “Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron.”
And this prophecy is only going to be further extenuated in the days to come. And again, as I keep reitatering: major prophecy is being fullfilled right before our very own eyes, but the supposed end-times ministries and “prophecy watchers” are shut up, and are busy caressing Trump’s smelly feet.
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
“Is it me, or does that “steak” look like a piece of OSB-plywood with char marks on it?”
ROFL
Apparently they have plant based tuna, too.
https://shop.goodcatchfoods.com/products/plant-based-tuna-naked-in-water
I love how it is labeled “non-gmo verified.” Yeah right lol.
The majority of those plant based “meats” are soy. Soy is terrible for your endocrine system it’s a killer to testosterone. Vegan gains are a myth; you want actual gains, then you gotta eat actual meat with workouts or physical activity
Yeah those radical vegans are immensely unhealthy.
Ikr! The non-gmo verification label is a joke and is a pretty poor indicator as to if something contains GMO (bioengineered) ingredients.
You gotta read this article!
Apparently 78% of products containing bioengineered ingredients aren’t required to disclose it because when they are tested, the genetic material isn’t showing up because the gmo food been highly refined…
https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2018/12/20/Final-GMO-labeling-rule-does-not-require-labeling-of-highly-refined-ingredients-from-GM-crops-if-no-modified-genetic-material-is-detectable
“Q. For purposes of the threshold, what types of records are required to show that the presence of a bioengineered substance is inadvertent or technically unavoidable? If a food manufacturer has specification sheets that require ingredient suppliers to provide inputs with less than or equal to 0.9% BE substance, can they assume that such presence is inadvertent or technically unavoidable?
At 7 CFR 66.5(c), the Standard exempts from disclosure a food in which no ingredient intentionally contains a bioengineered substance, with an allowance for inadvertent or technically unavoidable bioengineered presence of up to five percent for each ingredient. Any intentional use of a bioengineered food or bioengineered food ingredient requires disclosure.
If a regulated entity’s records indicate they have sourced a non-bioengineered ingredient and they have taken reasonable precautions to keep bioengineered and non-bioengineered ingredients separate, then AMS may presume that any bioengineered presence below five percent is inadvertent or technically unavoidable. A record that indicates an ingredient has less than or equal to 0.9 percent BE presence, without more, is insufficient because the amount up to or equal to 0.9 percent may have been intentionally included. A record that indicates an ingredient was sourced from a non-bioengineered crop, reasonable precautions have been taken to keep that non-bioengineered crop and ingredient separate from bioengineered crops and ingredients, and that any presence of a bioengineered substance is less than or equal to 0.9 would be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the exemption at 7 CFR 66.5(c).”
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be/faq/general
And here’s the cherry on top… remember the fruit and coke that tested positive for the baloneyvirus???…
“Our GMO Analysis Services
At ARBRO Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd., you can find a number of methods for conducting GMO tests. We always strive to give the best possible technology at the most competitive prices.
We have therefore chosen the DNA-based technology over the ELISA-based technology, which depends on assaying the protein for which the inserted DNA sequence is coding for. The DNA REAL-TIME PCR based technology targets the DNA of the plant as well as the DNA of the promoter, which has been used to modify the plant.
Along with a GMO test report, we even provide solutions for non-GMO testing that can help almost all manufacturing units that want to label their products.”
“5. How is PCR used to identify GMOs?
PCR, or commonly known as Polymerase Chain Reaction, is the gold standard method opted for detecting GMOs with appropriate quantification. Through this method, both GMO and non-GMO certifications can be provided as this comes under the industry-standard category.
GMO PCR method selectively amplifies the targeted DNA sequence which is specific for the GMO and the amplified sequences are detected using fluorescent dyes allowing for 3 types of analysis –
Qualitative GMO Analysis
Semi-Qualitative Analysis
Single-Threshold GMO Analysis”
https://testing-lab.com/food-testing/gmo/
Look on page 2 of the USDA’s National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Guidance on Testing Methods below:
“DNA-based test methods
At this time, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most widely used and commercially accepted test method for determining whether modified genetic material is detectable in a food or ingredient.”
https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/NBFDS_testingMethodology.pdf
Crazy stuff, I’ll have to add this to my list. I was going to do a thing about the non-gmo thing a while ago, but never got around to it. But now knowing this and the “Biosludge” thing, I need to do a report on this at some point.
You might wanna look into the pesticides they can use for organic farming, too. I think I might have seen a couple questionable ones. This is even more reason to start growing your own food. I bought some indoor grow lamps, so at some point in time I’d like to try and grow some microgreens.
A thought: Could the lost blame climate change for the future catastrophes of the book of Revelation?