“Especially when we use it in offices or in schools specifically, plexiglass does not help. If you have plexiglass, you’re still breathing the same shared air of another person [in the room.]”

According to a recent Bloomberg report, the sales for plexiglass tripled to around $750 million in the United States alone since the pandemonium hit last year – being one of the initial safety precautions instigated, that have been installed in businesses, schools, offices, schools, and other venues.

However, according to Joseph Allen of Harvard’s Chan School of Public Health, there is not a single study that proves their effectiveness to stop the virus.

We spent a lot of time and money focused on hygiene theater. The danger is that we didn’t deploy the resources to address the real threat, which was airborne transmission—both real dollars but also time and attention.

The tide has turned. The problem is, it took a year.

During the initial shockwave of pandemonium, high-ranking health officials and authorities said that larger droplets were a major concern for virus transmission, though people such as Allen and other researchers argued against these measures.

They warned that much smaller floating virus particles could spread, which would mean that the shields are not doing anything to stop transmission.

It was not until last month did the CDC and the WHO confirm airborne transmission.

Building scientist Marwa Zaatari, a task force member of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, says that the plexiglass has led “to a false sense of security.”

Especially when we use it in offices or in schools specifically, plexiglass does not help. If you have plexiglass, you’re still breathing the same shared air of another person [in the room.]

‘Recent CDC research found that desk or table barriers in Georgia elementary schools did not correlate with lower infection rates. Mask mandates and ventilation improvements did,’ according to Bloomberg.

The report also notes a study from the prestigious journal, Science, in April, that said that the numerous plexiglass barriers could raise the risk of symptoms.

Additionally, a Japanese paper in the prepublication stage released last month linked infections in poorly-ventilated offices in conjunction with all the plexiglass barriers.

The Bloomberg report concludes by writing, ‘Such studies raise the ironic possibility that when venues install too much plastic and thus impede ventilation, they could be raising the very risk they’re trying to reduce.’


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

[20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

1 Timothy 6:20-21

Gee-willikers, I could’ve told you this! But since I am an unlearned serf, the obvious does not matter; but when a guy from Harvard says it, then it’s like the voice of an angel. Obviously, if Covid (a virus that doesn’t even truly exist in my eyes) is so transmissible through the air, then what in the world what a stupid barrier do?

“Igloo Eateries” Becoming The New Ridiculous Trend

Band Students Forced To Play Instruments In Tents. The New Nazi Youth Gets Worse

Nevertheless, these studies just further demonstrate that quite literally all the supposed health and safety precautions, are nothing more than mere guess work. However, I must call out the nonsense when Bloomberg tries to say the masks helped slow transmission in a Georgia elementary school. No, they did not. Just like the plexiglass shields, the masks are doing nothing and make the health issues go UP. Plus, these elementary kids: they quite literally have better odds of falling down and scraping their knees than getting this “invisible killer.”


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK TO DONATE

3 Comments

  • It’s the feeling over the reality. If you are behind a plexiglass, you “feel” like you have a barrier of protection because you can see it and touch it. Same with a mask, it does nothing, zero, but people “feel” safer because something covers their mouth and nose. it’s psychological warfare.

    Don’t mind that the supposed virus is way smaller than the holes of the fabric, or that through any open flow of air it would both get out and get in. If this thing was HALF true, people would indeed be dying left and right, because news flash, masks don’t work and they would be trying to protect themselves in vain. However, because it is a “phantom illness” which is only really seen in the media, people put on a mask and they say “hey, I didn’t get anything, this might work!”, well yes, or there is NOTHING out there to begin with and you are being a good lapdog.

  • I have seen videos that the plexiglass popping up everywhere has a more sinister function for the near future involving tracking, triangulation, 5G, and taking out persons considered “undesirables”. In lieu of the “spike proteins”, this does not sound too far-fetched anymore. These monsters inflicting this worldwide plan way in advance and are meticulous.

Leave a Comment

×