After repeatedly saying for weeks and months that drinking conventional, store-bought, pasteurized milk is safe to drink and consumers would not have to fear ingesting bird flu, now some reports are claiming that Highly-Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) is spreading in both raw and pasteurized milk.

The WinePress has been covering the many reports of this purported bird flu spread since 2021. You can see the full coverage here. The most recent mainstream headlines warned of several human cases of H5N1 infections around the world, and biotech companies in talks with the U.S. government to produce new mRNA vaccines.

Most recently, a study published last week in The New England Journal of Medicine – “Cow’s Milk Containing Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus — Heat Inactivation and Infectivity in Mice” – received mainstream press attention. Long story short, the study claims that bird flu can spread in milk.

The study authors wrote:


Under these conditions, heat treatment for 15 or 20 seconds reduced virus titers by more than 4.5 log units but did not completely inactivate the virus. We emphasize that the conditions used in our laboratory study are not identical to the large-scale industrial treatment of raw milk.

[…] HPAI A(H5N1) virus may therefore remain infectious for several weeks in raw milk kept at 4°C.

Detection of virus in the mammary glands of two mice was consistent with the high virus load in the milk of lactating cows, even though these mice were not lactating. Collectively, our data indicate that HPAI A(H5N1) virus in untreated milk can infect susceptible animals that consume it.

In summary, HPAI H5–positive milk poses a risk when consumed untreated, but heat inactivation under the laboratory conditions used here reduces HPAI H5 virus titers by more than 4.5 log units. However, bench-top experiments do not recapitulate commercial pasteurization processes.


These findings were put on blast by the mainstream media:

  • “Bird flu found in cow’s milk – and it may survive heat treatment” – (Daily Mail)
  • “Raw cow’s milk infected with bird flu sickens mice, shows study” – (AFP)
  • “Bird Flu (H5N1) Explained: Study Suggests Drinking Infected Milk Could Spread Disease” – (Forbes)
  • “Limited testing of raw milk for bird flu leaves safety questions unanswered” – (NPR)
  • “Raw milk is the latest health fad. Experts worry it may spread bird flu.” – (The Washington Post)

On top of this, the mainstream media continues to press forth in their near daily warnings about the spread of bird flu, per some of these headlines:

  • “Four more pet cats die from bird flu – raising spillover fears” – (Daily Mail)
  • “We need to let science drive the response to avian influenza: Dr. Anne Rimoin” – (Fox News)
  • “CDC, WebMD give update on current bird flu outbreak: ‘Be alert, not alarmed’” – (Fox News)
  • “Why aren’t we vaccinating birds against bird flu?” – (Vox)
  • “What to know about bird flu — and how to keep yourself safe” – (Desert News)
  • “US dairy cows are tip of the iceberg as bird flu spreads in mammals globally, says ecologist” – (Phys.org)
  • “With avian flu and a new coronavirus variant spreading as summer begins, how can we keep healthy and still have fun?” – (CNN)
  • “How annual bird migration could spread avian flu” – (Reuters)
  • “US ‘Underprepared’ for Bird Flu Outbreak, Epidemiologists Warn” – (Newsweek)
  • “How a growing enthusiasm for raw milk is clashing with avian flu fears” – (The Hill)
  • “Bird Flu Keeps Spreading in U.S. Cows. 5 Big Questions, Answered.” – (Barron’s)
  • “4.2M Chickens to Be Killed After Bird Flu Detected” – (Newser)

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

It is also worth noting that there was a brief spurt of headlines warning about some supposed outbreak of salmonella in backyard chickens – more nonsense and lies to justify culling livestock and farm animals whenever ‘they’ can.

  • “Over 100 sickened in salmonella outbreaks tied to backyard poultry” – (Fox)
  • “Salmonella outbreak linked to backyard chickens prompts CDC investigation” – (USA Today)

Again, let me clarify that I think all this bird flu stuff is just propaganda and lies, I don’t believe any of it; but a narrative must created to justify the mass-culling of livestock, wildlife and pets, and yank meat and dairy from the stores, thus helping to fulfil these climate goals the elites have established; whilst killing millions worldwide with new vaccines and ones already injected into them…

1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; [2] Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; [3] Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

5 Comments

  • Pasteurized milk does not have all the nutrients because all the vitamins and minerals are destroyed. The Vatican does not want people to drink raw milk. Is germanics, nords, & scandivian people thrive with raw milk and animal products, even animal fat and organs.

  • AS with the fake COVID 19 virus, PLEASE SHOW US THE EVIDENCE OF THE BIRD FLU VIRUS. I WANT TO SEE REPRODUCIBLE STUDIES DEMONSTRATING ISOLATION PROCEDURES, A MINIMUM OF 200 SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM INFECTED BIRDS, PEOPLE, WHATEVER, ALL THE DETAILS OF THE ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION PROCESS. I WANT TO SEE AT LEAST 200 ELECTRON MICROGRAPHS PROVING THIS VIRUS ACTUALLY EXISTS. ITS FUNNY THAT WHEN THE COVID CRIME OCCURRED, THE REGULAR OLD FLU MYSTERIOUSLY VANISHED FROM THE CDC’S TABLE OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN 2021 AND MAYBE 2022, I DID NOT CHECK FURTHER, i GUESS THE FLU WAS ON VACATION ON A SOUTH PACIFIC ISLAND SIPPING FINE WINE AND LETTING COVID TAKE OVER WHILE THE FLU TOOK A BREAK BTW, THE COMMON COLD IS CAUSED BY………A CORONA VIRUS. THIS VIRUS MUTATES SO FAST NO COLD VACCINE WAS ABLE TO BE DEVELOPED TO THIS DAY. THERE IS NO WAY THE MOD (NOT “M”) RNA CONTRIVANCE COULD POSSIBLY DO ANYTHING EVEN IF THE VIRUS WAS REAL. ON A SIDE NOTE, I WAS INVITED INTO AN ONLINE COVID DISCUSSION GROUP BY DR. MCCULLOUGH. IN THAT GROUP I ENCOUNTERED A WELL KNOWN EPIDEMIOLOGIST FROM A PROMINENT SCHOOL. DURING OUR EXCHANGE, I COMMENTED THAT THERE WAS NO COVID 19 BUG AND WHAT DID HE THINK. HIS REPLY STUNNED ME. HE SAID THAT IT HAS TO EXIST BECAUSE SO MANY PEOPLE ARE WORKING ON IT. THERE YOU GO. I DO HAVE A MEDICAL BACKGROUND BUT NO LONGER PRACTICE. GOT OUT EARLY

    WHERE ARE THE STUDIES. “BLIND BELIEF IN AUTHORITY IS THE GREATEST ENEMY OF TRUTH” ALBERT EINSTEIN

    • BTW, to isolate by DNA, they have to have a viable sample of the viral DNA which is hard to extract so they can try running it through a PCR test. The PCR test was NEVER a diagnostic test unless it can be calibrated with a KNOWN SAMPLE of the DNA, RNA. You still need to isolate enough of the material to calibrate the PCR then run the cycles. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE????????Answer: GOVERNMENT PROCLAMATION is all. Recall that THEY ARE SCIENCE so who needs an analytical process. too much work if even possible

Leave a Comment

×