A judge reduced a $1.5 billion jury verdict against Bayer’s Monsanto unit by more than 60% last month, the latest legal win for the company as it fights thousands of claims that its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer.

The following report is by Agriculture Dive:

The ruling from the Cole County Circuit Court in Missouri slashes damages owed to $611 million total. A jury in November awarded four plaintiffs $1.5 billion in punitive damages and $61.2 million in compensatory damages.

The Supreme Court generally limits punitive damages to nine times the compensatory award. Bayer plans on appealing the verdict and maintains that glyphosate – the main ingredient in Roundup – is safe for use.

Bayer is ramping up its legal defenses to beat back a tidal wave of Roundup lawsuits that have weighed heavily on company earnings.

The agrichemical giant has added a litigation expert to its supervisory board and brought in new external counsel, CEO Bill Anderson said on an earnings call last month. In addition to appealing “every unfavorable verdict,” Bayer is engaging with policymakers to find other pathways to resolving the lawsuits.

“It’s clear that a strategy of defense alone is not enough,” Anderson told investors March 5. “We’re looking at the litigation topic from every angle, inside and outside the courtroom.”

The $1.5 billion verdict in Missouri was one of the largest awards in over five years of litigation surrounding the herbicide. In February, a California court reduced a $325 million verdict against Bayer by more than 90%.

Bayer has seen approximately 167,000 claims stemming from Roundup, with plaintiffs claiming that they developed cancers such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after using the product on their lawns or gardens. Although the majority of those cases have either been resolved or deemed ineligible, mounting litigation costs have become “a huge burden” on company financials, according to Anderson.

The company is hoping to put an end to the long-running litigation by seeking a review from the Supreme Court. It’s also pursuing legislative solutions — Iowa senators last week approved a proposal that would partially shield Bayer and other herbicide companies from future lawsuits.

“This is a top priority,” Anderson said in regards to containing litigation costs. “It’s not somewhere off to the side, but it’s front and center for us.”


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

The king by judgment establisheth the land: but he that receiveth gifts overthroweth it.

Proverbs 29:4

What else is new, these corrupt corporations and monopolies are constantly side-skirting punishment and judgment; as they continue to put smaller businesses and family out of work, continue to consolidate and subsidize the food and agricultural space, continue to poison and make people sick. And it’s not even like $1.5 billion for Bayer is that much: that’s chump change to them, and now they’ll be paying even less; while at the same time they and other firms lobby the government to continuously renege on the laws and create new loopholes to continue their destructive practices.


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

986 Comments

  • Excellent read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!

  • I just like the helpful info you provide on your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and test once more right here regularly. I’m relatively sure I will be told many new stuff right right here! Best of luck for the following!

  • You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I to find this topic to be actually one thing which I believe I’d by no means understand. It seems too complicated and very huge for me. I am looking ahead for your subsequent put up, I will attempt to get the hang of it!

  • magnificent post, very informative. I wonder why the other specialists of this sector don’t notice this. You should continue your writing. I am sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  • I appreciate, lead to I discovered just what I was having a look for. You have ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye

  • Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with some pics to drive the message home a little bit, but instead of that, this is excellent blog. A fantastic read. I’ll certainly be back.

  • I’d should examine with you here. Which isn’t something I normally do! I take pleasure in studying a submit that will make folks think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to remark!

  • What i don’t understood is actually how you are not really much more well-appreciated than you might be now. You are very intelligent. You recognize therefore significantly relating to this topic, produced me in my view imagine it from so many numerous angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be fascinated until it is something to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs outstanding. At all times care for it up!

  • Heya this is kind of of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  • Hi there, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam feedback? If so how do you protect against it, any plugin or anything you can recommend? I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  • Having read this I thought it was very informative. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this article together. I once again find myself spending way to much time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was still worth it!

  • Have you ever considered creating an ebook or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog based on the same information you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would enjoy your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e mail.

  • hello!,I really like your writing so much! percentage we be in contact more approximately your article on AOL? I require a specialist in this space to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Having a look forward to peer you.

  • I’ve recently started a site, the information you offer on this website has helped me tremendously. Thank you for all of your time & work. “The achievements of an organization are the results of the combined effort of each individual.” by Vince Lombardi.

  • The London Prat’s distinct advantage lies in its mastery of subtext as text. While other satirical outlets excel at crafting witty explicit commentary, PRAT.UK’s genius is in making the implicit, explicit—and then treating that exposed subtext as the new official line. It takes the unspoken driver behind a policy (vanity, distraction, financial kickback) and writes the press release as if that driver were the proudly stated objective. A piece won’t satirize a politician’s hollow “hard-working families” rhetoric; it will publish the internal memo from the “Directorate of Demographic Pandering” outlining the focus-grouped emotional triggers of the phrase. This method flips the script. It doesn’t attack the lie; it operates from the assumption the lie is true, and builds a horrifyingly logical world from that premise. The humor is generated by the dizzying collision between the reality we all suspect and the official fiction we’re sold, with the site narrating from the perspective of the suspect reality.

Leave a Comment