“Women” No Longer Exist By Definition According To Johns-Hopkins, Now Calling Them ‘Non-Man’

The following report is by Campus Reform:

Johns Hopkins University was slammed online this week for erasing women from the word “lesbian” in its LGBTQ glossary.

The university’s “Gender and Sexuality Resources” office contains a glossary of LGBTQ identities and terms. It includes a definition for the term “lesbian” that makes a point to exclude the word “woman.” It reads:

A non-man attracted to non-men. While past definitions refer to ‘lesbian’ as a woman who is emotionally, romantically, and/or sexually attracted to other women, this updated definition includes non-binary people who may also identify with the label.

But the term “gay man” has no such gender-inclusive phrasing in its definition:

A man who is emotionally, romantically, sexually, affectionately, or relationally attracted to other men, or who identifies as a member of the gay community. At times, “gay” is used to refer to all people, regardless of gender, who have their primary sexual and or romantic attractions to people of the same gender. “Gay” is an adjective (not a noun) as in “He is a gay man.”

Johns Hopkins was slammed for the change across the political spectrum, especially by LGBT commentators, on Twitter.

Why is a lesbian a non-man but a gay person isn’t a non-woman? Progressive misogyny.

Lesbian political commentator Arielle Scarcella wrote over a screenshot of the glossary.

Lesbians are being erased and it’s f***ing tragic. Gender ideology at its core is deeply homophobic. The two cannot coexist. It’s time for a divorce. #LGBWithoutTheT

Jaimee Mitchell, founder of Gays Against Groomers, replied to Scarcella.

Hi @JohnsHopkins. Congrats! You’re winning ‘homophobic statement of the decade’ by defining lesbians as ‘non men attracted to non men.’ And during Pride month, too! Shame on you. Lesbians are female homosexuals. Put that on a post-it & memorise it. Aren’t you meant to be smart?

Lesbian journalist E.J. Rosetta tweeted.

Erasure of women continues @JohnsHopkins.

The Parents of Loudoun County tweeted.

So men get to keep their spaces and their terms but women don’t? This screams misogyny.

Former University of Pennsylvania swimmer Paula Scanlan added.

Lesbians are now officially squirrels.

Daily Wire editor emeritus Ben Shapiro wrote.

J.K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter series and an outspoken critic of the transgender movement, shared a screenshot with the definitions of both “lesbian” and “gay man.”

Man: no definition needed. Non-man (formerly known as woman): a being definable only by reference to the male. An absence, a vacuum where there’s no man-ness.

Well, @JohnsHopkins gave us John Money so this is all congruent with the brand.

Concordia University professor Gad Saad chimed in, replying to Rowling.

Inarguably, modern times are now the stupidest time and universities are leading the way.

Fred Sargeant, co-founder of the first Gay Pride parade, tweeted.

Campus Reform reached out to the Gender and Sexuality Resources office for comment. This story will be updated accordingly.

---

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

[26] Saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive: [27] For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

Acts 28:26-27

The nonsense and abominations are out of control, clearly. Nothing makes sense anymore, to the point where even the established perverts and feminists that caused all of this, are now starting to whine and cry about the endless hypocrisies.

And this is the university that manages and hosts a lot of the health programs in this country, and trains up many of the doctors and staff that vomit these brainless and draconian policies. Why are we not surprised?

But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

2 Timothy 3:13

---

[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE