New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins – the replacement for the disgraced Jacinda Ardern – was recently asked point-blank to define what a woman is, but Hipkins could not give a straight answer.
Hipkins, when he was the former head of the country’s Covid-19 Response Team, once talked about “chasing out” those still reluctant to get vaccinated, and that they “will” get vaccinated.
Reported by the Daily Telegraph New Zealand, Hipkins could not answer what a woman is.
During a press conference a reporter asked Hipkins, “How do you and how does this government define a woman?”
Hipkins hesitated for a moment and then said,
[…] the question had ‘come slightly out of leftfield for me.The…. biology, sex, gender, umm…. people define themselves. People define their own genders…
He said
When pressured to ask again, Hipkins replied,
Well as I’ve just indicated I was not expecting that question, so it’s not something I’ve formulated, pre-formulated an answer on. But in terms of gender identity, I think people define their gender identity for themselves.
Since then the press reporter who asked this question has been permanently banned on Twitter, after it appears a lot of LGTBQIA+ supporters and allies managed to get him canceled.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
Do they provoke me to anger? saith the LORD: do they not provoke themselves to the confusion of their own faces?
Jeremiah 7:19
This is what happens to a society and a people that wholly rejects the truth of God’s pure word, the King James Bible, and instead embraces everything else, making science their god; and this is the end of it – leaders, the educated, the scientists, and the laity, unable to define in Preschool language what a man and a woman is.
[22] And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. [23] And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. [8] For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. [9] Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. [12] For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God. Genesis 2:22-23; 1 Corinthians 11:8-9, 12
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
You mean to say this numbskull is the prime minister of New Zealand and he doesn’t know what a woman is?!?! Something that even my unborn child knows the answer to that question!
Lemme guess what other kinds of intelligence is inside this moron’s nonexistent brain:
“The capital of Argentina is Saturn.”
“5 plus 5 is 76.”
“Robocop freed the slaves and was a war hero in the American civil vietnam war and was assassinated by Elmo.”