On September 26th, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a study that contradicts the mainstream media and health authorities, demonstrating that mothers who received an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine are shedding that mRNA in their breastmilk.
The study is titled “Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk,” by Nazeeh Hanna, MD, Ari Heffes-Doon, MD, and Xinhua Lin, PhD.
In the introduction to the study, the authors noted that ‘the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends offering the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to breastfeeding individuals, although the possible passage of vaccine mRNAs in breast milk resulting in infants’ exposure at younger than 6 months was not investigated.’ The researchers wished to determine if mRNA could in fact be found in the mother’s milk.
Their study concluded that it is surely possible for this to occur.
Of 11 lactating individuals enrolled, trace amounts of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were detected in 7 samples from 5 different participants at various times up to 45 hours postvaccination (Table 2). The mean (SD) yield of EVs isolated from EBM was 9.1 (5.0) particles/mL, and the mean (SD) particle size was 110.0 (3.0) nm. The vaccine mRNA appears in higher concentrations in the EVs than in whole milk (Table 2). No vaccine mRNA was detected in prevaccination or postvaccination EBM samples beyond 48 hours of collection. Also, no COVID-19 vaccine mRNA was detected in the EBM fat fraction or the EBM cell pellets.
Though the authors admit that their sample size is fairly small, and that they believe it is still safe for a mRNA-vaccinated lactating mother to breastfeed, they unequivocally confirm that vaccinated mothers can shed the vaccine ingredients to their babies. They wrote,
These data demonstrate for the first time to our knowledge the biodistribution of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to mammary cells and the potential ability of tissue EVs to package the vaccine mRNA that can be transported to distant cells.
Little has been reported on lipid nanoparticle biodistribution and localization in human tissues after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. In rats, up to 3 days following intramuscular administration, low vaccine mRNA levels were detected in the heart, lung, testis, and brain tissues, indicating tissue biodistribution.
We speculate that, following the vaccine administration, lipid nanoparticles containing the vaccine mRNA are carried to mammary glands via hematogenous and/or lymphatic routes.
Furthermore, we speculate that vaccine mRNA released into mammary cell cytosol can be recruited into developing EVs that are later secreted in EBM.
The authors wrote in the discussion in the panel
Scientists Develop Lab-Grown Breast Milk And Other Technologies To Track Farming. *Update*
This study corroborates with other pieces of evidence that demonstrate breastfeeding mothers can pass on the vaccine ingredients to their babies.
In May in of last year The WinePress cited an official 137-page document from Pfizer, recording their observations from the first three trials of their mRNA vaccine. Buried within their document, they admitted that it is very possible for breastfeeding mothers to pass on the ingredients to the baby, including during pregnancy and the early development phase of the baby in the womb.
Pfizer wrote:
A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Under Section 8.3.5.2 Exposure During Breastfeeding. This means it is possible for family, co-workers, and neighbors to pass on the ingredients by exhalation or touching the nursing mother.
Moreover, The WP again cited a Dutch report that documented an actual case of this, where a vaccinted mother’s baby developed uncontrollable twitches and ticks after being breastfed, to which the hospital actual refused to help the suffering child:
But as stated previously, the media and healthcare officials said this “phenomena” was not possible.
You can’t pass it from one person to another if you stand next to someone. That’s a very horrible misconception because it opens up this crazy thinking that you can stand next to people and get what they have, which we know historically has in public health really created a lot of damage.
Dr. Taraneh Shirazian. A NYU Langone gynecologist, said
Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie retweeted this study, writing, “Now we find out that Biden’s vaccine mandates caused infants (for which no safe dose has been established) to receive mRNA through their mother’s breast milk. Does abuse of power get any more evil?”
And even though Biden was responsible for the mandates, President Donald Trump – the self-declared “father of the vaccine,” and the man who launched Operation Warp Speed to produce these vaccines – still continues to endorse the shots, and has grown frustrated over people questioning their safety and efficacy.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
[20] Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. [21] And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. [22] Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. [23] And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.Revelation 2:20-23
I talked about this in my report, “Are You Awake? Are You Ready For What’s Coming? Do You Loathe The Honeycomb??,” the Lord Jesus Christ is saying that he indeed will kill the people’s children (including the saved) for not repenting of their wickedness.
But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons.
Colossians 3:25
The evidence continues to pile-up, proving just how deadly these “vaccines” are. Clearly, this is designed for depopulation: I don’t see any other explanation.
Death Shot: Scientist Demonstrates That The Vaccinated Are Shedding Graphene Oxide To The Unvaxxed
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
The terror of the Lord is the greatest motivation ever and I need to repent and I want to learn how to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ because I want to be safe and saved and know it.
https://winepressnews.com/biblical-salvation/
https://www.kingjamesvideoministries.com/
(salvation video at the very bottom on the home page)
I have been viewing videos from kingjamesvideoministries website/Born Again Barbarian on Youtube for years. And now with the friend of that ministry, winepressnews. Both are awesome sources of information.
Hear, hear!
Andrew: https://winepressnews.com/2021/09/13/the-forgotten-verses-of-salvation/