“[…] you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond Moderna’s control and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.”

After hundreds of millions of people have been voluntarily injected with the experimental mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, the pharmaceutical juggernaut Moderna is suing two of their heavyweight competitors Pfizer and BioNTech, alleging they infringed upon Moderna’s patents for their messenger RNA technology.

Moderna Refers To Their Vaccine As An “Operating System.”

According to a press prelease from Moderna published this morning, the company says, ‘Moderna believes that Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty® infringes patents Moderna filed between 2010 and 2016 covering Moderna’s foundational mRNA technology. This groundbreaking technology was critical to the development of Moderna’s own mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax®. Pfizer and BioNTech copied this technology, without Moderna’s permission, to make Comirnaty®.’

We are filing these lawsuits to protect the innovative mRNA technology platform that we pioneered, invested billions of dollars in creating, and patented during the decade preceding the COVID-19 pandemic.

This foundational platform, which we began building in 2010, along with our patented work on coronaviruses in 2015 and 2016, enabled us to produce a safe and highly effective COVID-19 vaccine in record time after the pandemic struck. As we work to combat health challenges moving forward, Moderna is using our mRNA technology platform to develop medicines that could treat and prevent infectious diseases like influenza and HIV, as well as autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases and rare forms of cancer.

Stéphane Bancel, Moderna Chief Executive Officer, said

We believe that Pfizer and BioNTech unlawfully copied Moderna’s inventions, and they have continued to use them without permission.

Outside of AMC 92 countries, where vaccine supply is no longer a barrier to access, Moderna expects Pfizer and BioNTech to compensate Moderna for Comirnaty®’s ongoing use of Moderna’s patented technologies. Our mission to create a new generation of transformative medicines for patients by delivering on the promise of mRNA science cannot be achieved without a patent system that rewards and protects innovation.

Moderna Chief Legal Officer Shannon Thyme Klinger, said

According to Moderna, the lawsuit is not an attempt to get Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine off of the market, nor collect their profits except past March 8th, 2022. Moderna vowed in October of 2020 that they would not enforce their patents on other companies, as a “commitment to equitable global access” to vaccines to stop the pandemic, the company claims. Moderna’s pledge then changed in March of this year when they claimed the Covid-19 pandemonium entered into a new phase, though still said they would not claim patent infringement on companies who distributed vaccines in the 92 lowest-income nations around the world, per the GAVI COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC 92). Moderna alleges that Pfizer and BioNTech have not upheld their end of that suretyship.

‘Moderna expected companies such as Pfizer and BioNTech to respect its intellectual property rights and would consider a commercially reasonable license should they request one for other markets,’ Moderna wrote.

Must Read: Moderna Is Using AI To Generate Endless Types Of MRNA Vaccines To Augment People With Each New Jab

As concerning the infringement itself, Moderna believes that Pfizer and BioNTech stole two key components of the mRNA tech, and that the two companies emulated and leeched from Moderna every step of the way, due to their lack of knowledge and skill with mRNA

Moderna wrote:


Moderna believes Pfizer and BioNTech copied two key features of Moderna’s patented technologies which are critical to the success of mRNA vaccines. When COVID-19 emerged, neither Pfizer nor BioNTech had Moderna’s level of experience with developing mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases, and they knowingly followed Moderna’s lead in developing their own vaccine.

First, Pfizer and BioNTech took four different vaccine candidates into clinical testing, which included options that would have steered clear of Moderna’s innovative path. Pfizer and BioNTech, however, ultimately decided to proceed with a vaccine that has the same exact mRNA chemical modification to its vaccine as Spikevax®. Moderna scientists began developing this chemical modification that avoids provoking an undesirable immune response when mRNA is introduced into the body in 2010 and were the first to validate it in human trials in 2015.

Second, and again despite having many different options, Pfizer and BioNTech copied Moderna’s approach to encode for the full-length spike protein in a lipid nanoparticle formulation for a coronavirus. Moderna scientists developed this approach when they created a vaccine for the coronavirus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) years before COVID-19 first emerged.

None of the patent rights which Moderna is seeking to enforce relate to any intellectual property generated during Moderna’s collaboration with the National Institutes of Health to combat COVID-19. That collaboration began only after the patented technologies at issue here were proven successful in clinical trials in 2015 and 2016.


Pfizer CEO Says They Are Working On New Annual MRNA Vaccines For Each Variant

In conclusion to their release, Moderna spoke directly to the reader, stating:

The forward-looking statements in this press release are neither promises nor guarantees, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond Moderna’s control and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

These risks, uncertainties, and other factors include those other risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Moderna’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022, each filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and in subsequent filings made by Moderna with the SEC, which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Earlier this year CEO Bancel lamented at the annual World Economic Forum summit at Davos, because he explained that his company was in the process of throwing out 30 million doses because “nobody wants them.”

Moderna Releases New ‘Superior’ Covid Vaccine, After CEO Says He Has To Throw Out 30M Doses Because ‘Nobody Wants Them’

The WinePress has noted in many different reports that, based on the data available, it would appear to suggest that the Pfizer-BioNTech jab has caused the most adverse reactions and deaths. Just in the United States alone, almost 118,000 hospitalizations have been reported to the U.S. vaccine injury database (VAERS) for Pfizer alone, significantly higher than Moderna’s alarming near-45,000.

Swedish Study Reveals MRNA In Pfizer Vaccines Converts To DNA In The Liver

An identical ‘phenomena’ is being documented across Europe (excluding the U.K.), with 22,191 deaths being reported to have transpired after receiving a Pfizer-BioNTech shot, versus the 12,285 deaths that have occurred taking the Moderna mRNA shot.

Courtesy: EudraVigilance/ Health Impact News

As for nations such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, see also:

The WP has extensively covered vaccine injuries and deaths since their administration.

Moreover, some doctors have explained in detail how the numbers reported to the VAERS system, for example, are extremely conservative at best; suggesting the death numbers should be multiplied by a factor of around 42. The math and evidence for such a claim can be read below:

Death Shot: Data Reveals That At Least 150K Americans Have Died From The Covid Vaccines – at the time that was written.

Death Shot: Indiana Life Insurance CEO Says Deaths Are Up 40% Among Ages 18-64. Tens Of Thousands Are Dying Daily


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it: and he that hateth suretiship is sure.

Proverbs 11:15

This lawsuit is purely, 100%, a dog & pony show, sock-puppet theater, a Saturday Night Life skit to the fullest. After hundreds of millions of people have received one of these mRNA death shots, and multi-billions were injected into people, now Moderna wants to pretend to care about how their instruments of death were stolen and copied from them?!

[5] The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. [6] For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. [7] The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right.

Isaiah 32:5-7

I made sure to include the numbers of deaths and injuries, because, while Pfizer definitely is the worst of the worst, I have no doubt that alternative and “patriot” pundits – such as the “Robert Malones of the world” – will surely spin this news on its axis, and craft some estranged narrative out of it.

Death Shot: The Novavax Covid Vaccine Is Just As Bad As All The Rest. MRNA Inventor Robert Malone And Others Endorse It

All parties are ALL evil, they are ALL in on it, and they seek to make as much money as they can before getting rid of their silly customers.


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

4 Comments

Leave a Comment

×