Two weeks ago Australian media was touting the use of a new phone app, that claims it can detect a Covid infection by the sound of a cough. Now it seems the United States’ Food and Drug Administration is permitting a test that can test someone’s breath to see if they have Covid-19.
The following is a press release from the FDA:
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the first COVID-19 diagnostic test that detects chemical compounds in breath samples associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. The test can be performed in environments where the patient specimen is both collected and analyzed, such as doctor’s offices, hospitals and mobile testing sites, using an instrument about the size of a piece of carry-on luggage. The test is performed by a qualified, trained operator under the supervision of a health care provider licensed or authorized by state law to prescribe tests and can provide results in less than three minutes.
Today’s authorization is yet another example of the rapid innovation occurring with diagnostic tests for COVID-19. The FDA continues to support the development of novel COVID-19 tests with the goal of advancing technologies that can help address the current pandemic and better position the U.S. for the next public health emergency.
Said Jeff Shuren, M.D., J.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
The performance of the InspectIR COVID-19 Breathalyzer was validated in a large study of 2,409 individuals, including those with and without symptoms. In the study, the test was shown to have 91.2% sensitivity (the percent of positive samples the test correctly identified) and 99.3% specificity (the percent of negative samples the test correctly identified). The study also showed that, in a population with only 4.2% of individuals who are positive for the virus, the test had a negative predictive value of 99.6%, meaning that people who receive a negative test result are likely truly negative in areas of low disease prevalence. The test performed with similar sensitivity in a follow-up clinical study focused on the omicron variant.
The InspectIR COVID-19 Breathalyzer uses a technique called gas chromatography gas mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) to separate and identify chemical mixtures and rapidly detect five Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in exhaled breath. When the InspectIR COVID-19 Breathalyzer detects the presence of VOC markers of SARS-CoV-2, a presumptive (unconfirmed) positive test result is returned and should be confirmed with a molecular test. Negative results should be considered in the context of a patient’s recent exposures, history and the presence of clinical signs and symptoms consistent with COVID-19, as they do not rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions, including infection control decisions.
InspectIR expects to be able to produce approximately 100 instruments per week, which can each be used to evaluate approximately 160 samples per day. At this level of production, testing capacity using the InspectIR COVID-19 Breathalyzer is expected to increase by approximately 64,000 samples per month.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
Wise men lay up knowledge: but the mouth of the foolish is near destruction.
Proverbs 10:14
So a cheap Walmart tacklebox with a straw in it is going to tell us we have Covid – a virus that has never been isolated and proven to cause disease? What’s the point of this if it is not meant to be used as a bonafide testing measure?
US Rollouts New Federal Ventilation Guidelines In Schools And Businesses To Fight Covid
Dyson Creates A New Set Of Headphones That Purifies The Air Around You
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
More fear porn
More stripping away of freedoms
More tyranny
More God’s judgement unless there’s true repentance
More illusion of safety and security.
Jacob, Bryan, you gotta help! My mom is so led astray and in bondage to that satanic pente-CATHOLIC cult! I need help. Here’s a recent text she sent me attacking the word of God:
Fact:
King James Version (KJV), also called Authorized Version or King James Bible, English translation of the Bible, published in 1611 under the auspices of King James I of England.
If the only way to be saved is to follow the KJV, then what happened to all the people who followed God and accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior before it was translated into English and published under the rule of King James I of England. That includes the apostles of Jesus, all the writers who write the Bible under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, etc? That would mean that no one was saved and went to heaven before KJV was written. That would also mean that the KJV Bible is to be worshiped, even above God and Jesus since just believing in Jesus and what He did for all of mankind on the Cross, would not be enough, and Jesus and His atoning sacrifice would not have the power to save us and redeem us. That is in conflict with the Word of God. Therefore, that view is not true.
I was just thinking about this and I began to consider what this view would mean. I thought I would share my thoughts, just to think about. It’s not intended as a point of argument.
The KJV is the best translation of the original Hebrew and Greek. However, if reading the KJV is necessary for salvation, then that says that salvation is by works (reading of the KJV) and not by faith in Jesus Christ. That view does not agree with the Bible. That is evident in John 3:16 and Romans 10:13, as well as numerous other scriptures.
2 Timothy 3:14 But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
2 Timothy 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2 Timothy 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Verse 15 ends the argument. Bryan did not mention this passage in his videos, but this one succinctly ends the debate. The scriptures are what allow you to even understand who Jesus Christ is and his salvation he offers. That’s why the word is magnified above his name (Psa 132:2). Moreover, the passage says that Timothy had and known the scriptures. This leaves two choices: he had access and preserved every single bit of the ‘original’ manuscripts, and had possession of them; or he had access to copies of the word of God that were preserved and perhaps translated. The second choice is the answer, and the same thing repeated itself with the KJB, with the Lord preserving his word for us in English.
If she doesn’t accept that, then she is outright denying what the scriptures say of themselves and how God operates.
Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
Proverbs 30:6 Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.
Notice how the scriptures are spoken of as a person? That is not referring to the Lord, it is referring to the word that is living.
Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
Hebrews 4:13 Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.
Thank you, Jacob. Glory goes to Jesus and Jesus only, but you’re a hero and so is Bryan, but you and him are here because of Jesus.
Reading the KJB is necessary, but not because one needs to work at maintaining being saved. Among other extremely profitable things, the King James bible will confirm and judge whether one is genuinely saved or not, therefore it’s a must to read it to know this, if one cares to be sure whether he’s really saved or not.
Wanting to read and study the book more and more is something that comes naturally after you get saved. If one’s not moved to know more about God’s word, his thoughts, his advice, his requirements, prophecies, the truth in the KJB, then he’s lost.
Which is most, if not all of my relatives, and my parents, are. Straight up lost. They don’t believe the King James bible. And most of them will and have taken the vaccine and will die unsaved. Unless the Lord gives them his mercy and more time to be convicted of their conscience to start to read the KJB and get saved before the vaccine kicks in their bodies. Or if they live long enough to experience the wrath of God in Jacob’s trouble to get scared enough to wail for salvation. But it is a great possibility that most, if not all of them, will go to hell.
Matthew 7:13-14
13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and BROAD IS THE WAY, THAT LEADETH TO DESTRUCTION, AND MANY THERE BE WHICH GO IN THEREAT: 14 because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
You could probably get more accurate results by farting into the straw.
Probably so. Or put dandruff on it, that’ll probably be more accurate.
THIS IS TOTAL BS. THE APP CAN DIAGNOSE A “SPECIFIC” NON-EXISTENT VIRUS BY A COUGH???? ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THIS BULL CRAP IS BRAIN DEAD.
I HAVE A MEDICAL/SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND. I KNOW WHAT IT TAKES TO CLAIM A NEW VIRUS EXISTS. THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE ANYWHERE PROVING THIS VIRUS EXISTS. CORONA VIRUS IS ALSO THE COMMON COLD. IT MUTATES SO RAPIDLY AND SO OFTEN, ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE A VACCINE FOR IT
ONLY PROOF I HAVE THAT IT DOES NOT EXIST ARE TWO CDC DOCUMENTS FROM 2020 AND 2022 CLAIMING, IN THEIR WORDS THAT THEY HAVE “NO QUANTIFIABLE” SAMPLE OF THE VIRUS,. IT DOES NOT EXIST. I CAN SUBMIT THE TWO DOCUMENTS FROM CDC FOR ANYONE WHO WANTS TO SEE THEM. PROTON MAIL IS REAL THIS TIME