Barron’s published a detailed report last week titled “A Golden Age of Vaccines Is Here. What It Means for You.” The report explains how some of the leading pharmaceutical companies are seeking to rake in new revenue streams with new vaccines, such as ones with mRNA technology among others, to treat a myriad of other ailments, after these titans experienced record profits from the last several years from manufacturing Covid-19 vaccines.
The following are excerpts from that report:
Roll up your sleeves. Effective new vaccines have hit the market for everything from pneumonia to shingles to RSV to, of course, Covid-19. And that’s just the beginning.
There were 258 vaccines in development as of 2020, according to a report from trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA. It found that $406 billion in direct medical costs were saved due to routine childhood vaccination of U.S. children born from 1994 to 2018.
Pharmaceutical companies are currently developing everything from personalized cancer vaccines that could cost tens of thousands per patient to vaccines that prevent developing-world diseases like malaria or tuberculosis. Improved flu, pneumonia, and meningitis vaccines will also be available in your neighborhood pharmacy.
Scientists are testing vaccines to prevent a virus believed to cause multiple sclerosis in some people. Someday, vaccines could routinely treat acne, protect against peanut allergies, and even prevent heart disease or help treat Alzheimer’s disease.
Last year, Moderna and Merck conducted a trial in which personalized vaccines that used genetic sequencing to target specific mutations in each patient’s cancer helped slash the recurrence rate for metastatic melanoma. The two pharmaceutical companies plan to try the same approach on lung cancer and other carcinomas.
“One of the most powerful things in human health is the immune system,” says Moderna President Stephen Hoge, himself a physician. “We now understand cancer as a disease that emerges later in life principally, not because of mutations but because the immune system gets less effective in controlling it.”
[…] Vaccines, by contrast, use the body’s own immunological response to fight off disease. They tend to have fewer long-term side effects than drugs, despite the recent surge in vaccine hesitancy in the American public.
“Why are vaccines better than drugs? Vaccines prevent things from ever happening so you never have to treat them,” says Kawsar Talaat, an infectious disease physician and vaccine scientist at Johns Hopkins.
Pharmaceutical companies didn’t prioritize vaccines because they tend to be less profitable than medicines that must be taken every day for years, Talaat says. “It has changed quite a bit in the past few years.” Since Talaat completed her residency at the Medical College of Wisconsin in 2001, she says she has seen drops in patients with certain types of pneumonia, rotavirus, and shingles because of vaccines.
Drug companies are spending big on vaccine development. New technologies have made it possible for them to develop effective vaccines more quickly and cheaply than in the past. When the Covid pandemic hit, drug companies were able to deliver effective vaccines to the public in roughly a year—a fraction of the time that vaccines typically take. Pfizer and partner BioNTech (BNTX) and Moderna received tens of billions of dollars in revenue selling their Covid vaccines.
But the end of the pandemic also underscored the business challenge that vaccines pose for drug companies. Sales of Covid booster shots have cratered this year, and Moderna—whose Covid vaccine is its only approved product—is scrambling to get new products on the market. It hopes to have a respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, vaccine approved by the spring of 2024, followed by a flu vaccine, and then a combination Covid-flu-RSV shot in 2025.
“Our vision is to combine the viruses that drive flulike symptoms into a single dose so you don’t need to worry which virus you get the booster for, whether it’s Covid, RSV, or flu,” says Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel. He says that respiratory diseases are the No. 3 or No. 4 killer in most countries, and that a combo shot could prevent most of them.
Pfizer, meanwhile, is working on its own combination respiratory virus vaccine and is training its sights on infectious disease of all stripes. Anderson, the Pzifer vaccine R&D chief, points to the development of a vaccine for pregnant women for Group B strep bacteria. The bacteria isn’t usually dangerous for women but can be transmitted during birth and can lead to sepsis, pneumonia, meningitis, or seizures for babies. She says this strep is particularly problematic in less-developed countries and communities in the U.S. where pregnant woman get less prenatal screening.
While Moderna represents a concentrated bet on vaccines, Pfizer, GSK (GSK), and Sanofi (SNY)—leading vaccine makers in the U.S.—are huge, diversified companies selling an array of products. They all see vaccine development as a key area of business over the coming years.
Sanofi, a leader in selling flu shots, has a stated goal of doubling vaccine sales and becoming the industry leader in immunology by 2030, hitting 10 billion euros ($10.84 billion) in annual vaccine sales. Sanofi says it will have three to five major vaccines in final-stage trials by 2025, including an RSV toddler vaccine, a pediatric pneumonia vaccine, and an improved yellow fever vaccine.
GSK sells the only shingles vaccine available in the U.S. It is improving its pneumonia vaccines and herpes vaccines so they treat more strains. Phil Dormitzer, GSK’s global head of vaccine R&D, notes that his company is doing early-stage research on a vaccine for gonorrhea, which is a growing health problem because of antibiotic-resistant strains of the venereal disease. “It used to be relatively easy to treat. Now, there are more drug-resistant strains to treat,” he says.
Researchers also are developing nontraditional vaccines. Pfizer, partnering with vaccine specialist Valneva (VALN), and Moderna are testing Lyme disease vaccines. Sanofi is developing one that combats the bacteria that causes acne skin disruptions.
The Food and Drug Administration recently gave fast-track status to a vaccine to treat the effects of Alzheimer’s disease. Instead of fending off a pathogen, vaccines could be used to make the body more tolerant of allergens like peanuts, scientists say. Meanwhile, a heart-disease vaccine would cause the body to produce less cholesterol. All of these vaccines are being researched.
And earlier this year, the government announced a $5 billion effort, dubbed Project NextGen, to develop new and better Covid vaccines. Among other things, the project will attempt to develop nasal vaccines that could better protect against infection, and is targeting vaccines that could work on a variety of coronavirus diseases.
The biggest challenge facing vaccines is no longer the science but the growing number of Americans that refuse to take them.
Vaccine hesitancy has been a growing issue for years. It exploded during the pandemic, when thousands of Americans quit jobs rather than receive a Covid vaccination. While 92% of American adults have received at least one Covid vaccination shot , according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, only about 21% got the booster shot being given earlier this year, and roughly 14% have received the current booster.
“You have the meteoric rise of science for developing and producing vaccines at the same time you have increasing skepticism and rejection of vaccines,” says Dr. Gregory Poland, who heads a vaccine team at the Mayo Clinic.
[…] Pharmaceutical companies are trying to make their vaccines more palatable to the American public. A lot of people dread needles, so drug companies are developing more vaccines that can be taken through a skin patch or a nasal spray.
If rising numbers of Americans refuse to take vaccines, it could ultimately crimp vaccine development, says Poland. “If they won’t take them in our society where our vaccines are produced by for-profit manufacturers,” he says, “manufacturers aren’t going to invest the roughly $1 billion it takes to go from a concept to a marketable vaccine.”
GSK’s Dormitzer agrees that vaccine hesitancy is a growing problem but says the current number of people who don’t take vaccines isn’t “enough to discourage drug companies from coming out with new vaccines.” He notes that despite pushback against Covid vaccines, the majority of Americans were vaccinated at least once.
Growing vaccine hesitancy doesn’t seem to be impeding vaccine development, which is being juiced by new technology. The drug companies increasingly are using mRNA technology, tiny chunks of genetic material that tell the body’s cells to crank out specific proteins, such as the spike in the Covid virus, that produce an immunological response. “We can do very complex proteins because the mRNA is just a piece of software to code,” explains Moderna CEO Bancel.
Read the full article here.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
1 Timothy 6:9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. [10] For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. [20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
Per usual and no surprise, it always comes down to money. Big-pharma is dying for more money, and they are looking to make major returns on investment with all these new kinds of shots they are creating – vaccines that I will most definitely not be taking, thank you very much.
Of course, when this “next pandemic” rolls out you better believe they will have vaccines ready to go much sooner next time…
Bill Gates Says ‘We’ll Have Giant MRNA Factories For The Next Pandemic’
US Pays Moderna $176 Million To Develop MRNA Bird Flu Vaccine Amidst Growing Pandemic Fears
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.


Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good results. If you know of any please share. Cheers!
You made some clear points there. I looked on the internet for the topic and found most individuals will consent with your website.
I?¦m now not sure the place you’re getting your info, however good topic. I must spend a while studying more or understanding more. Thank you for magnificent info I was in search of this info for my mission.
I want to convey my gratitude for your kind-heartedness giving support to those who need help on in this subject. Your special commitment to getting the message up and down had been extraordinarily insightful and have really empowered most people like me to arrive at their ambitions. This useful tips and hints denotes this much a person like me and even further to my office workers. Many thanks; from all of us.
I really enjoy looking through on this site, it contains good articles. “I have a new philosophy. I’m only going to dread one day at a time.” by Charles M. Schulz.
Greetings from Los angeles! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break. I really like the knowledge you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, very good blog!
Lovely just what I was looking for.Thanks to the author for taking his time on this one.
This is a very good tips especially to those new to blogosphere, brief and accurate information… Thanks for sharing this one. A must read article.
I like the efforts you have put in this, thank you for all the great articles.
I couldn’t resist commenting
I like this blog very much so much wonderful information.
you’re really a good webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible. It seems that you’re doing any unique trick. Furthermore, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve done a great job on this topic!
Helpful info. Lucky me I found your website by accident, and I am stunned why this accident didn’t happened earlier! I bookmarked it.
I went over this internet site and I believe you have a lot of superb information, bookmarked (:.
Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is magnificent, as well as the content!
The line between satire and reality is now so blurred it needs its own satirical news anchor. — Toni @ Bohiney.com
My coffee tastes better when accompanied by a fresh article from The London Prat.
The long-range forecast is a fairy tale.
The climate is ideal for growing mildew.
Compared to NewsThump, PRAT.UK delivers satire that feels properly observed rather than exaggerated for effect. The jokes land because they’re rooted in real British behaviour. That makes it far more readable and memorable.
Kannur call girls sound politically aware
Call girls in India manage expectations professionally low
The Ilhan Omar financial transparency debate mostly involved people squinting at a graph like it insulted them.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The Poke often feels like internet humour stretched too thin. PRAT.UK feels written with intent. The quality gap is clear.
The Prat newspaper: because a well-crafted joke is sometimes the truest form of news.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This authenticity fuels its function as a pre-emptive historian. The site doesn’t just satirize the present; it writes the first draft of the future’s sardonic historical analysis. It positions itself as a chronicler from a slightly more enlightened tomorrow, looking back on today’s follies with the benefit of hindsight that hasn’t actually happened yet. This temporal slight-of-hand is profoundly effective. It reframes current anxiety as future irony, granting the reader a psychological distance that is both relieving and empowering. It suggests that today’s chaos is not an endless present, but a discrete, analyzable period of farce, with a beginning, middle, and end that the site is already narrating. This perspective transforms panic into perspective, and outrage into the material for a wry, scholarly smile.
This approach reveals a second strength: a peerless ear for the music of institutional failure. The writers are virtuosos of the specific cadences of managerial newspeak, political evasion, and corporate apology. They don’t mimic these dialects; they compose original works in them. A piece on prat.com is often a concerto for passive voice and weasel words, a sonnet of shifting blame. The satire is achieved through flawless musicality. You laugh because the rhythm is so precisely that of a real ministerial statement, but the melody is one of pure, unadulterated farce. This linguistic precision makes the critique inescapable. It proves the language itself is the first casualty, and the site’s mastery of it is the weapon that turns the casualty into the accuser.
Fluconazole inhibits fungal cytochrome P450 14a-demethylase, disrupting ergosterol synthesis.
The comments about British bureaucracy are so painfully accurate they’re almost hard to read. The mix of Kafkaesque nightmare and sheer farce is captured perfectly. It’s the laugh-or-you’d-cry school of journalism.
Furthermore, the site’s aesthetic is one of impeccable sterility. There is no emotional frenzy, no partisan spittle-flecked rage. The design of prat.com is clean, the prose is clinical, and the tone is that of a disinterested auditor. This cultivated sterility is the perfect petri dish for growing absurdity. By removing the heat of anger and the fog of sentiment, the pure, ridiculous shape of the subject matter is allowed to grow in isolation, displayed under the cool light of logic. This approach is far more devastating than any rant. It implies that the subject is so inherently foolish it doesn’t require embellishment or heated opinion; it merely requires calm, factual exposition to reveal its own joke. The laughter it provokes is the clean, sharp sound of truth being recognized, not the messy roar of catharsis.
C’est intelligent, c’est drôle, c’est nécessaire. Le London Prat est un essentiel.