The following report is by Joe Doran of The Trends Journal:
What a way to wind up 2023.
Elon Musk reinstated Alex Jones to X (formerly Twitter) this past weekend, much to the dismay of legacy media.
But that wasn’t even the headline.
An extraordinary group “conversation” broadcast on X included Musk, Jones and various personalities that have been at the forefront of dissident thought leadership in the U.S. over the last decade.
There was Andrew Tate, Mark Dice, Laura Loomer, insurgent Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, and more, mixing it up and dropping news galore.
At one point, Musk and Jones, answering a query from General Mike Flynn, said they would be up for a debate with Klause Schwab and Bill Gates over the future course of humanity.
At another point, someone could be heard taking a piss with their mic on. It turned out to be Vivek.
“Well, I hope you feel better now,” Musk deadpanned.
“I feel great, thank you,” Ramaswamy responded in good humor.
Musk said that X would soon debut video group conversations—probably by the end of the year, or in early 2024 at the latest.
He also doubled down on freedom of speech on his platform, saying X would strive to follow the U.S. Constitution, and reiterated that if it came down to profit or free speech, he was prepared to continue standing for the latter.
Even prominent voices on the left, including Ed and Brian Krassenstein, expressed support for the decision to reinstate Jones on X.
Technocracy A Hot Subject
Technocracy emerged as a central subject of discussion.
Musk strongly advocated what he termed a pro human future, based on population growth and a quest to explore—and eventually colonize—nearby planets.
He rejected the notion that degrowth policies and restrictions on human freedom were necessary to save the planet, and said the simplest thing people could and should do to support civilization is to commit to having children.
Most of the world has currently fallen into demographic decline, and several who took part in the conversation agreed that technocratic elites were behind policies promoting depopulation and (average) human decline.
TRENDPOST: The conversation on X this weekend is well worth seeking out, for anyone who missed it. It marked a watershed moment in the years-long battle over free speech.
On the subject of Technocracy, was the thinking completely clear-eyed? No. Elon Musk is an uber tech optimist, and both he and Alex Jones at one point contended that sophisticated technology like brain chips, AI and presumably genetic bio engineering were “tools” that like any tool, could be used for good or ill.
But AI is certainly not just a transformative technology of its time, like the printing press, the light bulb (ie. electrification), cars, computers or the Internet. It is more analogous to an alien intelligence.
As far as genetic engineering, while CRISPR may be a tool, our genetics embody ourselves. Questing to redesign ourselves is a De-Human disaster, born of misguided hubris, waiting to happen.
Technology optimism should spill over into an embrace of the central idea of scientism, which sees humans as a point along a pathway of “progress” destined to outmode the naturally human, via technology.
Despite those not quite adequately “grokked” pitfalls, those involved in the debate certainly conveyed heartfelt—and heartening—pro-human sentiments.
Though Degrowth as a term was not named, Musk pointed out that civilizations are either growing or dying, and that “stasis” was not sustainable.
And the very fact that the discussion took place at all, with many banned or censored personalities, struck a thunderous blow in favor of free speech.
Anyone who doubts that it unnerved the censorship authoritarians need only do a quick search on the event, to see the reactions from most corporate media.
It’s hard to underestimate the importance that X will likely play during the 2024 election cycle. It represents the largest social media platform willing to allow the level of freedom of speech that prior to 2016, used to be taken for granted by most Americans.
About that, Musk commented: “We’re certainly going to have a contentious election, and perhaps some contentious elections worldwide. The X platform will strive to be as truthful as possible about what’s going on. That’s gonna be the goal.”
There’s little doubt that Musk is likely to see a ramp up of regulatory scrutiny, and lawfare attacks on his businesses, as a result of his stand.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
This whole this is just one big giant psychological operation in the battle for your mind, to lead you astray. Again, I know faithful WinePress readers understand this, but it is always important to brush up on this stuff.
Musk is continually painted as being one of the “good guys” who’s on our side. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I’ve heavily documented Musk’s corruption and what he really stands for; for him being blatantly saying things word-for-word that align with the World Economic Forum (WEF), wants to turn X (formerly Twitter) into the Chinese surveillance state app Wechat, tells Chinese executives that he’s in favor of censorship, and has censored people on X (The WinePress having posts get ratioed for dropping bombshells); wants to put chips in people’s heads; has private visitations at The Vatican, and on and on. The fact that people think Musk on “their side” makes me laugh every time. Check out my articles on him here.
As for Alex Jones, he is easily one of the greatest, textbook examples of what controlled opposition and being an asset of the state looks like. Jones is just an agent in disguise. He tells some truth and is allowed to divulge some truthbombs every once in a while, but constantly flip-flops and endorses blatantly obvious things and people that go against his supposed patriotism, and “fighting the new world order.”
SEE: Alex Jones Gives High Praise To Transgender Blair White, Says ‘God Is Working Through You’
Have you ever noticed how every time we hear about some guy or gal being “the most censored,” the exact opposite is true, and he or she is constantly shoved down our throats on mainstream and alt media, podcasts, and more? Alex Jones is a prime example of this.
More recently, Jones and InfoWars released a 2-D platform videogame, where you get to play as Alex Jones as he fights the deep state with gun in hand, vanquishing foes like Soros, Schwab, Zuckerberg and more; aided by his friends and allies like Trump, Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, and more. It’s just one big parody that makes fun of some of the stuff Jones has said throughout the years, and again reveals who’s in the club, like Carlson; who people somehow think he’s another “good guy” who thinks like you do – someone I was calling out since The WP got started, basically.
Making videogames like this makes him no better than anyone else, who is trying to distract you and preoccupy your focus on vain and addictive vices.
The whole point of me mentioning this article is to get remind and warn people of the pysop that’s going on. It’s a battle for your mind and leading you down the wrong path – a path that is a trip the manipulators at the top are doing to deceive you. When this country falls apart, these guys will be seen as heroes and step in as saviors. It’s a trap!
SEE: Operation “Trust:” The 100-Year-Old Psy-op Repackaged As Qanon
The Great Reset Versus The Great Awakening: Fighting For The Same Team
Remember When Trump Spoke At The World Economic Forum With His ‘Good Friend’ Klaus Schwab?
[27] An ungodly man diggeth up evil: and in his lips [28] A froward man soweth strife: and a whisperer separateth chief friends. [29] A violent man enticeth his neighbour, and leadeth him into the way that is not good. [30] He shutteth his eyes to devise froward things: moving his lips he bringeth evil to pass. Proverbs 16:27-30
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
The best thing to do is know that’s there, and then ignore all that is said. It’s all, pyscho babbel.
If you ever care to look up who elons grandpa is he’s in the topic of technocracy