“Exclusionary naming conventions developed in the 1800s, clouded by racism and misogyny, don’t work for us today,” the organization in charge says.

The following report is a press release from the American Ornithology Society:

CHICAGO (November 1, 2023)—Today the American Ornithological Society (AOS) announced that in an effort to address past wrongs and engage far more people in the enjoyment, protection, and study of birds, it will change all English bird names currently named after people within its geographic jurisdiction. The AOS will also change the process by which English names are selected for bird species. The effort will begin in 2024 and will focus initially on 70–80 bird species that occur primarily within the U.S. and Canada.

There is power in a name, and some English bird names have associations with the past that continue to be exclusionary and harmful today. We need a much more inclusive and engaging scientific process that focuses attention on the unique features and beauty of the birds themselves.

Everyone who loves and cares about birds should be able to enjoy and study them freely—and birds need our help now more than ever.

AOS President Colleen Handel, Ph.D., a research wildlife biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Alaska, said

Ornithologists have long grappled with historical and contemporary practices that contribute to the exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, including how birds are named. For example, in 2020, the AOS renamed a small prairie songbird found on the Great Plains to “Thick-billed Longspur.” The bird’s original name—honoring John P. McCown, an amateur naturalist who later became a general in the Confederate Army during the U.S. Civil War—was perceived as a painful link to slavery and racism.

Today, the AOS is taking decisive action to reframe the issue of birds named after people altogether. Specifically, the scientific society is announcing three changes to the way it and its predecessor organizations have operated since the 1880s:

  • The AOS commits to changing all English-language names of birds within its geographic jurisdiction that are named directly after people (eponyms), along with other names deemed offensive and exclusionary, focusing first on those species that occur primarily within the U.S. or Canada.
  • The AOS commits to establishing a new committee to oversee the assignment of all English common names for species within the AOS’s jurisdiction; this committee will broaden participation by including a diverse representation of individuals with expertise in the social sciences, communications, ornithology, and taxonomy.
  • The AOS commits to actively involving the public in the process of selecting new English bird names.

As scientists, we work to eliminate bias in science. But there has been historic bias in how birds are named, and who might have a bird named in their honor. Exclusionary naming conventions developed in the 1800s, clouded by racism and misogyny, don’t work for us today, and the time has come for us to transform this process and redirect the focus to the birds, where it belongs.

I am proud to be part of this new vision and am excited to work in partnership with a broad array of experts and bird lovers in creating an inclusive naming structure.

Judith Scarl, Ph.D., AOS Executive Director and CEO, said

North America has lost nearly 3 billion birds since 1970. Says Scarl, “To reverse these alarming bird population declines, we need as many people as possible to get excited about birds and unite to protect them.”

Since 1886, the AOS and its predecessor, the American Ornithologists’ Union, have maintained a list of official English-language names for birds in North America (and more recently, South America). These names are widely used by schools and universities, government agencies, conservation organizations, the news media, artists and writers, birders and photographers, and many other members of the English-speaking public worldwide. These English names are often updated as scientists discover new information about the ecology and evolution of these birds.

In addition to their official English names, birds, like all living things, have a two-part scientific name that scientists use to communicate among themselves across languages and nationalities. For example, Haliaeetus leucocephalus is the scientific name for the Bald Eagle. Scientific names will not be changed as a part of the AOS English bird names initiative, but they are regularly reviewed and updated by the AOS’s North American and South American classification committees in response to new scientific research and following the naming rules of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature.

The AOS will conduct an open, inclusive, and scientifically rigorous pilot program in 2024 to develop its new approach to English bird names in the U.S. and Canada. Additionally, the AOS has come to see its authority over the English names of Latin American birds in a new light and has committed to engaging in a broader set of conversations with ornithologists and organizations in Latin America before proceeding with Latin American name changes. Interested parties are invited to follow this initiative’s progress at www.americanornithology.org and @AmOrnith on major social media platforms over the coming months and years.


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

Proud and haughty scorner is his name, who dealeth in proud wrath.

Proverbs 21:24

What can I say? These looney progressives are idiots. Renaming these birds will obviously not encourage more people to get into bird-watching and wildlife preservation, and will just waste more paper, ink, time, and money having to make the changes.


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

6 Comments

  • you gotta be kidding me …. what a clown show. but while their at it how about removing all latin “scientific” names to plain proper english.

  • Well, I hope they include the ‘cardinals’….lol!! Such a nasty monicker for such a lovely bird of God’s creation singing praises to God all the day long, & even through the darkness of winter. Idiocy reigns, and truth has most definitely fallen in our streets, but what they really hate about the Victorian age & age of British expansion is God’s word, the King James Bible, & knowledge of God that came with it, even & in spite of the corruption of the State system itself. There’s an excellent, basic Bible article up at purecambridgebible today on ‘eth’ in the King James Bible: a real blessing. And, a simple homeschool truth to show & remind our children about, too, as we teach English & language. Verb tenses matter, but can be a dry subject to teach.
    Adding the eternal tense to the temporal puts the beauty & majesty of holiness, the sweetness of the Gospel, & the solid rock assurance back into it, while planting eternal seeds with hope. How these things matter, how they all relate to our great God to either repentance & belief to salvation, or to rejecting the truth for lies to damnation & loss. Our Rock is not as their rock, even our enemies being the judges. Those three little letters in a verb ending that the ‘experts’ say are antiquated & pointless actually convey how the true & eternal Jesus of the Godhead, & our faith….is not as these fleeting changelings & impure idol jesuses and perver$ion$ of men & devils. Be encouraged: God’s word is true, and proven more to be so with each passing day, though they be vexing, hard or difficult in this dying world.

  • OOHHH dear Lord, what is wrong with these…are they even people…complete ridiculousness.

    Chicken Little has come back; “the sky is falling, the sky is falling…

    • Uh-oh Aaron. Chicken Little is imperialistic, racist & misogynist….or was that the Little Red Hen that was ‘red’, an unashamed keeper at home in her work, & who wouldn’t share her harvest saved to the sustenance of her children, & those humble deserving, with those who wouldn’t work & did nothing but proudly mock & vex her as she obediently, humbly & faithfully did? (Then trying to shame her & to steal it from her by taking the ‘high new ethical’ ground through sophist revisionism…. : – ) I wonder if the Little Red Hen worked with a trowel in one hand & a weapon, a sword, in the other?
      Somehow I’m thinking she did….lol! Proverbs, Nehemiah, Thessalonians & Hebrews 4&5 KJB

  • “Move on, nothing to see here!” It’s only another sickening account of sheer lunacy and an attempt to distract from the larger issues of life. I can hardly wait to see each of these asylum inmates stand before God to give an account of their earthly deeds. When we consider that Hell is only a temporary holding pen, I can see how the judgment of so many of them could require a thousand years or more. They’re everywhere, and they’re “for the birds!” Pun intended.

Leave a Comment

×