The state of Montana is considering a new piece of legislature that would criminalize the donation of blood from people who have received a Covid-19 vaccine, but opponents of the bill say this will “decimate” the state’s blood supply and cause deaths because patients will be unable to get necessary transfusions.
According to the Daily Montanan, ‘House Bill 645 would ban individuals who received the COVID-19 vaccine from donating blood, making it a misdemeanor with a $500 fine to donate or accept blood from vaccinated donors. The bill would also ban people who have had a diagnosis of “Long COVID,” medically defined as “postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 due to chronic 27 SARS-CoV-2 viral infection.”’
Montana’s blood supply could be cut by up to 80%, leading to adverse patient outcomes including unnecessary and unconscionable death.
Senior vice president of blood collection nonprofit Vitalant, Cliff Numark, said
Numark added that most blood banks these are days are woefully underfilled as is, but if this bill were to pass then the supply of blood for necessary operations will not be there if needed.
Opponents have also added that there is no way to test the blood for “Long Covid” or vaccine ingredients. “There’s no test to do that, so we would not be able to comply to determine whether people have received it or not,” Numark added.
But proponents say this bill is designed to protect patients for inadvertently getting Covid infections or vaccine ingredients into their body without proper consent.
We hear these two words ‘safe and effective’ a million plus times. Does that make them true?
Bill sponsor Rep. Greg Kmetz (R), explained
Rep. Lola Sheldon-Galloway, vice-chairwoman of the House Human Services Committee, has also cited Stew Peters’ “Died Suddenly” documentary warning about the Covid-19 harmful effects as evidence for why such a bill needs to be signed. She also cited her brother for confirmation, who is a mortician.
I’m one of many who believe in the God given right of medical freedom, which is having access to genetically unmodified blood during a time of need. This is a vital part of health autonomy.
Jo Vilhauer from Miles City, said
The Daily Montanan further described the drafting process and the problems with flameworking such a bill:
In response to committee questioning, Numark said it would be possible to ask donors if they had received the COVID-19 vaccine as part of an intake form, but that the criminal liability attached to the bill adds complications.
Rep. Jodee Etchart, R-Billings, who requested the bill, asked sponsor Kmetz if he had considered establishing a system of two banks of blood, one vaccinated and one unvaccinated. Etchart had worked with Kmetz to bring forward legislation about COVID and the blood supply.
Kmetz said he’s spoken with constituents who said they didn’t want “vaccinated blood making a patient’s health situation even worse.”
“We are not going to consider that,” Kmetz said.
During the drafting process, Kmetz asked a bill drafter if it would be possible to allow for separating blood supplies to make the bill “less contentious.” The drafter said she could include that language but she was not familiar with the intricacies of the process and wouldn’t be able to answer if it was possible.
Etchart asked in an email when the bill was being drafted whether anyone would qualify to donate blood with the language that was in the bill at the time. She said nearly the entire population has either knowingly had COVID-19 or been vaccinated.
The way it appears, no one will qualify, and this bill will go down so fast it isn’t even worth bringing.
Etchart said.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
[22] And in all thine abominations and thy whoredoms thou hast not remembered the days of thy youth, when thou wast naked and bare, and wast polluted in thy blood. [23] And it came to pass after all thy wickedness, (woe, woe unto thee! saith the Lord GOD;) Ezekiel 16:22-23
As I have reported many times over, as have plenty of others, those who got vaccinated with that stuff have very tainted and corrupted blood, proven time and time again.
There are no good solutions here. These death shots should have never been introduced in the first place, and if people would take better control of their health they would not be so dependent on the system.
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
I personally support blood transfusions to save people’s lives out of love for them, however I do not want any blood transfusion in which the blood came from a vaccinated zombie. I will remain vigilant.
In my part-time, I earn $500+ per day using my mobile phone. Last month, I earned $16723 in my fourth paycheck. It is an easy, q10 awesome job that anyone can do. my one of oldest friend has made over $17543 in her part time from home.
This is what I d0………www.jobsrevenue.com