“Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.”

After three years of habitually urging the public to get a Covid-19 vaccine, to not only protect ourselves but others around us from contracting and spreading Covid, that the vaccines were the only way to “stop the spread,” and after nearly 80% of the American population has received at least one dose, and 68% got two, and 33% with three injections – Dr. Anthony Fauci and his constituents are now saying that both old and new vaccines are not effective in generating immunity against viral diseases like Covid or the flu.

Fauci, along with Dr. David M. Morens, Senior Advisor to the Director at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., a Senior Investigator for Viral Pathogenesis & Evolution Section at NIAID – recently published a paper in the journal Cell, that discusses vaccines and their effectiveness against ailments like Covid, influenza, RSV, and the common cold.

SEE: MSNBC Broadcaster Yasmin Vossoughian Says She Developed Myocarditis And Pericarditis Because Of The ‘Common Cold’

The paper is called “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses.”

In the opening summary the doctors wrote:

Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.

In this review, we examine challenges that have impeded development of effective mucosal respiratory vaccines, emphasizing that all of these viruses replicate extremely rapidly in the surface epithelium and are quickly transmitted to other hosts, within a narrow window of time before adaptive immune responses are fully marshaled.

We discuss possible approaches to developing next-generation vaccines against these viruses, in consideration of several variables such as vaccine antigen configuration, dose and adjuventation, route and timing of vaccination, vaccine boosting, adjunctive therapies, and options for public health vaccination polices.

In the early introduction of the paper, the authors admit that long before Covid fears were on the scene the flu was the dominant annual threat, but had “less than suboptimal vaccines” available to the public to prevent infection.

The authors followed that with this admission:

Over the years, influenza vaccines have never been able to elicit durable protective immunity against seasonal influenza virus strains, even against non-drifted strains.

Although current influenza vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death to some degree, their effectiveness against clinically apparent infection is decidedly suboptimal, ranging from 14% to 60% over the past 15 influenza seasons.

While Fauci and his cohorts still recommend annual broad vaccination for most people and high-risk groups, they say that “vaccine acceptance by the general public is not ideal” – which was of course seen since the get-go with many people indifferent and pessimistic about taking experimental vaccines, though ultimately 8 out of 10 of Americans took at least one dose since late-December, 2020.

Courtesy: USA Facts, last updated in August ’22

Nevertheless, Fauci and the other doctors say that little has been improved upon these flu vaccines they call “suboptimal,” and that “the rates of effectiveness of our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.”

Howbeit, the authors still say that the Covid vaccines “saved innumerable lives and helped to achieve early partial pandemic control,” for it was because the number of variants that popped-up and confounded initial immunity. But they once again concede that “candidate vaccines for most other respiratory viruses have to date been insufficiently protective,” including those for things like RSV, coronaviruses, flu strains, and “common cold[s].”

As for the future of vaccines, on the pretense that natural immunity is not as effective and as preventative, they say, the doctors wrote:

If natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we expect vaccines, especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so?

This is a major challenge for future vaccine development, and overcoming it is critical as we work to develop “next-generation” vaccines.

Later in the piece the authors add that as for the future of new vaccinations, “a key unanswered question remains how to control these responses to avoid harmful inflammatory consequences.”

The Covid-19 vaccines have been generated tons of clinically studied and anecdotal reports of the shots generating high amounts of harmful inflammation, namely that of myocarditis and pericarditis, which is the inflammation of the heart muscle and the lining surrounding the muscle.

SEE: Can N-Acetylcysteine Repair And Possibly Prevent Covid Vaccine Damage?

Fauci and friends also note that a “single vaccine” may not be effective in generating the proper immune response needed:

The implications for vaccinology are clear: preventing viral upper respiratory infection and limiting post-infection viral spread to contiguous respiratory compartments are both critical but may not be easily achieved with single vaccines.

To understand how vaccines might protect against lower respiratory infections, we will need to learn how the “cross-talk” between upper respiratory, lower respiratory, and systemic immune systems is coordinated and controlled, at the level of cell receptors, antigen sensing, antigen presentation, and numerous effector functions.

We also need to further investigate the development and maintenance of viral-specific lung resident memory B and T cells, how to increase their persistence in the lung, and how quickly they can be mobilized to infected mucosal sites.

They wrote

Furthermore they said that “In developing next-generation vaccines, we will need to identify strong immunologic correlates of protection against each mucosal respiratory virus and agree about their relevance to public health vaccination goals.”

As for judging the new wave of vaccines and their effectiveness in high risk groups, the authors say that the “elderly are the most important litmus test risk group for vaccine prevention” for things like Covid, flu, RSV, and more.

SEE: Bill Gates Tells Al Jazeera How To Prepare For The ‘Next Pandemic’ And ‘To Moderate Some Of The Insanity’ Online

Moving forward they write that new theories “prompt reconsideration of many accepted approaches, such as one-time annual influenza vaccination at the beginning of influenza seasons.” They also suggest the prospect of “intranasal” vaccines – vaccines that are in a mist form that are inhaled, and perhaps even eye drops.

In conclusion, Fauci, Morens, and Taubenberger wrote:

We must think outside the box to make next-generation vaccines that elicit immune protection against viruses that survive in human populations because of their ability to remain significantly outside of the full protective reach of human innate and adaptive immunity.

Past unsuccessful attempts to elicit solid protection against mucosal respiratory viruses and to control the deadly outbreaks and pandemics they cause have been a scientific and public health failure that must be urgently addressed.

We are excited and invigorated that many investigators and collaborative groups are rethinking, from the ground up, all of our past assumptions and approaches to preventing important respiratory viral diseases and working to find bold new paths forward.

SEE: Ivanka Trump Admits In Tweet That The Trump Admin. Already Partnered With Moderna To Produce MRNA Vaccines BEFORE Operation Warp Speed


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

But ye are forgers of lies, ye are all physicians of no value.

Job 13:4

Thank you Dr. Obvious, for quietly admitting in a paper that hardly anyone will see, stating something the so-called “conspiracy theorists” and “anti-vaxxers” have known for a VERY long time.

But, as you should remember, there was not a day where these devils were telling us that the vaccination was the only thing that could save us and nothing else, and were the ticket to take off the mask, and get normal freedom and autonomy back. Of course, that lasted only for a month until the media and health gurus told everyone to put the masks back on because the shots were not working – because your “anti-vax” neighbor wants to kill everybody by being selfish, and not walking “Christ-like.”

A man that beareth false witness against his neighbour is a maul, and a sword, and a sharp arrow.

Proverbs 25:18

But now that the “pandemic is over” (per the words of Sloppy Joe) and nobody wants to fight the Covid War anymore, save a few surviving Neo-Coronazis walking amongst us; Fauci and his motley crue can state the obvious in a paper that most will not read or care about.

Be that as it may, Fauci and crew’s “suggestions” for future death shots should be noted and remembered. Knowing what we know now about these shots as the masses flop like a fish more and more, this may infer to what the next round of death shots will be engineered to target in the “next pandemic.” For more on that, you can read the finer details in their paper that were not discussed in this post.

Besides all of that, this also represents another leg in the narrative change we began to really see admitted in the mainstream to start 2023. More and more of this will begin to occur, as to, I believe, cause a greater uproar and upheaval from the masses, who feel adulterated, used, harmed, and killed.


[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

4 Comments

Leave a Comment

×