Climate change will now be a mandated curriculum in the state of Connecticut in every school district per a recently passed law, apart of the state’s Next Generation Science Standards.
The bill was passed with 31-8 votes with bipartisan support.
The new law will go into effect in July 2023, where schools must integrate lesson that teach climate change is caused by mankind and ways to reduce it.
‘Through the curriculum, students will gather an understanding of how human activities have influenced changes in the climate, how the changing climate and its adverse effects can impact populations, and learn about possible climate solutions and their related costs, reliability, and socio-environmental impacts. Fifth-grade, eighth-grade, and eleventh-grade students are tested on climate change,’ explains The Planetary Press.
Climate science is often one of the first things, along with arts, to go when budgets are tight.
A lot of poorer communities weren’t being taught this, and that’s really a travesty, because people of color and people in cities are more affected by climate change… For me, it was a matter of environmental justice.
State Representative Christine Palm, Vice Chair of the Environment Committee of the Connecticut General Assembly, told The Connecticut Mirror.
The environmental advocacy outlet suggests that many teachers and school districts have been wanting more climate emergency teachings and classes for sometime, but political discourse has gotten in the way of that, and asserts that many other schools are improperly teaching it.
IFL Science writes: ‘The move comes after a series of educational affronts across some US states, including the banning of record numbers of books across 32 US states and various attempts from some state governors to control what is taught in schools.’
‘A national survey of science teachers found that most middle school and high school teachers devote just one to two hours of instruction on climate change during the academic year, with 30 percent of teachers incorporating less than an hour,’ The PP added.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge.
Proverbs 14:7
Add this to the infinite list of reasons why you cannot allow children to go to public schools, as many schools have been teaching this climate nonsense for a LONG time. I remember when they were trying to shove this garbage down my throat when I was in kindergarten, as story time consisted of ‘green’ propaganda and the poor polar bears trapped on an iceberg…
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
Mandating lies since they got Darwin’s pagan evolutionary philosophy into the schools as ‘science’ to avoid separation of church & state, mandating their lie of antichrist religion be taught. There was a reason the Jesuit Teilhard du Jardin was involved in the Piltdown & Peking man frauds, as well as the Jesuit Georges Lemaitre who smuggled in the kabalist order from chaos ‘big bang’ as ‘science’. Just more of the same old, same old. They used to go ballistic back at First Masonic & the GARBC-Masonic when I would say, “But we DO have a mandated state religion: evolution.”
–
It was like a chorus, “Oh no…that’s not a ‘salvation issue’, that’s ‘science’.” Quickly followed by, “We don’t even know if those creation verses were in the originals or not, and ‘the church fathers’ said it was all allegory.” ……so which was it? Go figure that their preferred oldest and bestest Vaticanus and Sinaiticus lack most of Genesis & all of Revelation. So convenient.
–
Yeah. The same sort of ‘science’ as Stacey Abrams holds to. And she doesn’t even pretend to have a Bible other than First Ungrounded Opinions and Cuz-I-Say-So & You-can’t-make-me.
Shove all the propaganda and useless stuff in up there, then vomit it out on your test sheet, and then forget all about it when you leave. That’s basically what most students do.