“There was never at any stage, even by the following year, any form of analysis of the harms caused by lockdowns. Were they even considered? I haven’t seen any evidence that they were and that is very, very troubling.”

The following report is from Summit News:

A prominent lockdown advocate who advised the UK government admits in a new book he got it wrong and that there was never any proper consideration of the devastation caused by lockdowns.

Well, we told you so.

Professor Mark Woolhouse is a member of SPI-M, the modelling group on SAGE, the group that advises the British government on lockdown measures.

Professor Mark Woolhouse

SAGE has become notorious for consistently predicting doomsday COVID scenarios that never even come close to passing, such as last year’s warning that Omicron could cause 6,000 deaths a day in the UK without harsher restrictions.

Just as SAGE got it spectacularly wrong earlier in the summer, without substantially harsher restrictions being imposed, Omicron caused nowhere near that level of fatalities.

In a new book called The Year the World Went Mad, Woolhouse expresses regret at SAGE’s involvement in pushing lockdown measures that caused huge devastation yet only served to delay the spread of the virus.

We knew from February [2020], never mind March, that the lockdown would not solve the problem. It would simply delay it.

Said Woolhouse, adding that no one in government appeared to recognize the failing of that strategy.

“The early global response to the pandemic was woefully inadequate,” says Woolhouse, adding that the WHO praising China for its draconian ‘zero COVID’ approach set the scene for similar disasters across the world.

Woolhouse was asked why governments set about imposing such brutal restrictions with seemingly no regard for their consequences.

There was never at any stage, even by the following year, any form of analysis of the harms caused by lockdowns. Were they even considered? I haven’t seen any evidence that they were and that is very, very troubling.

Said Woolhouse.

As early as April 2020, SAGE was sent information confirming that lockdowns would “cost three times more years than the disease itself,” but there was virtually no consideration of the fact that “those over 70 had at least 10,000 times the risk of dying as those under 15 years old.”

The government then lied to the public in claiming that the virus “doesn’t discriminate,” despite this being manifestly untrue.

I heard [the official] argument caricatured as: everyone died, but at least no one was saved unfairly. BBC News backed up this misperception by regularly reporting rare tragedies involving low-risk individuals as if they were the norm.

While those who correctly warned that lockdowns would cause devastation were summarily demonized, smeared, cancelled and deplatformed, what if any punishment will lockdown advocates who got everything wrong face?


AUTHOR COMMENTARY

[18] As a mad man who casteth firebrands, arrows, and death, [19] So is the man that deceiveth his neighbour, and saith, Am not I in sport?

Proverbs 26:18-19

So, after two-plus years of helping to destroy the U.K., and influence Europe and the West to accept the necessity of lockdowns, now he admits he got it wrong? Gee, ya think so?

As I have warned would happen, you are seeing more and more of these shills and sellouts who have been deceiving people since day one, now do a 180-degree turn to cover their derrieres. This is identical to Dr. John Campbell, who The WP recently exposed for doing this.

Dr. John Campbell Is Another Big-Pharma Shill Who Is Now “Suddenly” Exposing The Covid Vaccines

Speaking of which, further proving that he is a total fraud, now he’s getting into the ‘Beat up Bill Gates’ propaganda (a classic thing all alternative outlets do, is make Bill Gates the center of attention for everything it seems), and even was interviewed by total fake stage actor Russel Brand!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSvc5gFif8E

[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

6 Comments

Leave a Comment

×