Today, after a bit of delay and controversy, cellular and broadcasting giants AT&T and Verizon have now switched on their C-band 5G services. This will allow many people across the United States to finally have access to the service.
However, many airports will not have it activated just yet, with fears of flight delays and other glitches in the system.
Verizon says that their 5G services are 10 times faster than the 4G LTE, and in some areas, offering faster downloading speeds of 1 Gbps.
Engadget writes,
‘AT&T is taking a relatively cautious approach to its rollout. Its C-Band 5G services are live in “limited parts” of eight metro areas, including Detroit and Chicago as well as Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston in Texas. Folks in three regions in Florida — Jacksonville, Orlando and South Florida — can also use AT&T’s C-Band network.
‘Verizon (Engadget’s former parent company) says that 100 million more people will gain access to its 5G Ultra Wideband network this month in more than 1,700 cities, including C-Band coverage. So, most metro areas should have at least some C-Band 5G coverage from Verizon in the coming weeks.’
The Effects
While the worry in the media has been about flight delays, no mention of the potential health effects are noted.
For instance, scientists published their findings and precautions in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, and summarized in January 19th, 2021, on Study Finds, had this to say:
As mankind rolls into the 2020’s, most of the world is anxiously awaiting the rollout of the new fifth generation (5G) signal for their digital devices. While telecom giants promise this new network will provide more connectivity than ever before, some are still concerned about what these high-strength signals will do to human health. A professor from the University of Edinburgh is going one step further; urging both nations and network providers to stop the 5G rollout until its radio waves are proven safe for human exposure.
In an opinion piece appearing in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Professor John William Frank of the Usher Institute contends that radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) can be potentially harmful to people. He states that the transmitter density the 5G signal needs will end up exposing more people to high levels of RF-EMFs.
The study notes that 5G is being celebrated across the world as a new era in telecommunication; bringing both economic and lifestyle benefits to phone and internet users. The health implications of these radio waves however, continues to spark debate between scientists.
Prof. Frank says there are four critical areas of concern that have not been addressed regarding 5G. First, Frank says there is a lack of clear information about the technology telecom companies are using to make the 5G network. At the same time, there is a growing amount of research pointing to RF-EMFs disrupting human biology.
Second, Frank argues there is an almost complete lack of epidemiological studies looking at the health impacts of 5G exposure. The professor is also concerned with new health studies which show evidence that exposure to older signals (like 3G and 4G) may cause health problems too.
Lastly, Frank points to accusations that some national telecom regulatory authorities are not basing their RF-EMF safety standards on modern science, since stricter policies may cause a conflict of interest.
The study finds 5G uses a much higher frequency, with radio waves measuring between three and 300 gigahertz. The network also uses a new and relatively untested supportive technology which enables users to transmit more data.
Frank says the fragility of the network means 5G needs more boosting antennas than with the older 2G, 3G, and 4G signals. These older signals use low frequency waves instead. That dense transmission network helps 5G developers to achieve their promise of “everywhere/anytime” connectivity.
Despite other studies generally declaring 5G signals harmless to humans, Prof. Frank argues many have been of “varying scientific quality.”
The researchers adds there are “a growing number of engineers, scientists, and doctors internationally… calling on governments to raise their safety standards for RF-EMFs, commission more and better research, and hold off on further increases in public exposure, pending clearer evidence of safety.”
The study notes that current maximum safety limits for RF-EMF exposure vary significantly depending on what country you live in. Moreover, the definition of “5G” is not even consistent yet in regards to its technology and the components each company uses.
It is highly likely that each of these many forms of transmission causes somewhat different biological effects—making sound, comprehensive and up-to-date research on those effects virtually impossible.
Frank explains in a media release.
The study finds there is recent evidence that RF-EMF exposure may cause wide-ranging effects to reproductive, fetal, oncological, neuropsychiatric, skin, eye, and immunological health. There is, however, no proof these radio waves are causing the spread of COVID-19.
There are knowledgeable commentators’ reports on the web debunking this theory, and no respectable scientist or publication has backed it. The theory that 5G and related EMFs have contributed to the pandemic is baseless.
Conspiracy theories aside, Frank’s study concludes that there is enough evidence to invoke “the precautionary principle” when it comes to rolling out this new network — regardless of the economic impact.
Until we know more about what we are getting into, from a health and ecological point of view, those putative gains need to wait.
This is just one example of a researcher sounding the alarm on some concern – that gets completely ignored by the media.
The effects of 5G, EMF radiation, microwaves, WiFi, BluTooth, have been long documented. The WinePress recently reported on the push to electrify the oceans with 5G and other EMF technologies, that are already causing environmental issues.
And these issues occurring underseas can also be noticed on land and air. Such as the case with birds dropping dead for these last several years especially, and worldwide bee populations declining – a decline that began in the 1900’s and continued from there.
And in the case with mankind, effects are also present. Some of them can be read in the documented below:
More about the effects of 5G on us can be read here and here:
Even a study published in 2006 noted a symptom of radiotherapy – a treatment used on cancer patients – noted an impairment and loss of taste. Sound familiar?
On top of this, nutritionist Frank Tufano notes in a video about EMFs and 5G – among many – that there seems to be a general correlation with a new rollout of radiotechnology and disease at the same approximate timeframes.
- 1918 (Radio) – Spanish Flu
- 1981 (1G) – Influenza outbreak
- 1991 (2G) – Influenza outbreak
- 2003 (3G) – SARS
- 2009 (4G) – Swine Flu
- 2020 (5G) – Covid-19
Needless to say, the effects of 5G and these many radio wave technologies are numerous and noted, though often voluntarily and purposefully forgotten.
5G And Vaccines
Though the effects of 5G and other EMFs are suppressed, what is not yet known is what will happen with 5G and those that have received a, or multiple, doses of a Covid vaccine.
Most would think that this sounds silly, as the professor noted in the aforementioned warning on 5G discussed on Study Finds; but that is the topic of debate for another time.
Howbeit, we have studies that show 5G is bad for us in general. So, what of the vaccinated? What studies do we have to show what effects this will have on them? I guess we are about to find out.
Why do I pose this question?
Well, in 2021 The WinePress reported that the people who received a Covid-19 vaccine can indeed be affected remotely and connected to a network; and how the gene editor CRISPR can be used remotely, without physical contact.
In the longer term, similar to how DNA based vaccines are being electroporated into the human body to fight Covid-19, we may expect that electrogenetic promoter circuits will be inserted into human cells to open a new modality of bioelectronic signaling.
A snippet from that report
Moreover, The WP has documented – as noted in that report also – the Covid vaccines do have graphene oxide in them, which is needed for 5G transmission and function.
And on top of that, The WP has also shown that the vaccinated have magnetic capabilities, and can stick magnets to themselves. Some recipients have even documented that they can generate an electromagnetic pulse, per spikes on EMF pumps.
New Zealand Doctor Records That Vaccinated Patients As ‘Magnetic’
So the question remains, what will, if anything, happen to the vaccinated? The answer remains to be seen, until now.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTARY
We’ll find out what happens, but I suspect to see a greater rise in heart arrhythmia: leading to more strokes and heart attacks, and other vascular related diseases. I suspect to see much greater levels of confusion, forgetfulness, cognitive decline even further; irritability and fierceness; piercing headaches and migraines; more twitching and more irregular body movements; increased aging and noticeable damage to skin, hair, eyes, tongue, and so on; nausea and vomiting, and more.
Let me know your thoughts.
Regardless, the move to further control the masses’ minds and bodies is moving forward.
[13] This their way is their folly: yet their posterity approve their sayings. Selah. [14] Like sheep they are laid in the grave; death shall feed on them; and the upright shall have dominion over them in the morning; and their beauty shall consume in the grave from their dwelling. Psalms 49:13-14
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
This may offer some clues:
https://444prophecynews.com/the-pressure-of-fear-lynne-johnson/
https://444prophecynews.com/they-will-know-exactly-who-you-are-because-of-the-pure-dna-frequency-rosaine-scruff/
https://444prophecynews.com/watch-out-for-erratic-behavior-lynne-johnson/
I believe that when the 5G is fully activated and operational, the vaccinated zombies will be very hostile.
I think when the 5G is activated, the vaccinated zombies will start to act more dangerous.
I don’t know about that, Thomas. But I suspect after what I experienced…nonvaxed…this week, & as a known resisting Bible believing elderly Christian challenging Laodicea in a highly Masonic area, that we elders within reach of this technology will be regularly & routinely targeted in sweeps & targeted energy attacks by both those identifying as the ‘white hats’ & the ‘black hats’ to cull seemingly randomly, & take out the unprepared or weakened in any way while the vaxed & compliant go on into the tribulation & thinking nothing amiss. Just ‘progress and change’, ‘transformation’ as usual. Trying to wear us down, & to take out circles of resistance. Isaiah 57. The Lord rebuke them. Their damnation & their judgment is just. And their pride is their downfall.
–
The young who can do so need to seek areas away from developed areas.