The following report is from the Trends Journal:
A report by The Free Thought Project detailed how the legal framework of “health and welfare” has been twisted to serve practically any government-dictated political design.
The health and welfare of the children (and by extension their principal caregiver) should not be jeopardized because of [his] public behaviour in promotion of his opinions.
Superior Court Justice George W. King opined in his ruling, according to the CBC.
The government broadcaster didn’t name the father involved in the case, to shield the identity of the children.
Human rights advocates north of the border mostly expressed little concern over the ruling. Ottawa-based human rights lawyer Yavar Hameed said that people have the right to express themselves, but that expression is limited at the point where harm can come to another person.
So it’s not just a matter of freedom of conscience, freedom of expression protected by the charter of rights and freedoms, it’s expressions that simply might relate because of the underlying actions on the safety of another person.
Yavar Hameed
But what health issues are actually at stake? The case represents how selective “wrongthink” is being used to target political opposition in dangerous ways. Most people, and especially children, have near zero risk of being seriously medically affected by COVID. In fact, studies have shown that prolonged lockdowns have had more deleterious effects on the health, well-being, and education of children than the virus.
Meanwhile, the utility of masks, whether single, double, or triple, is scientifically dubious. In the U.S., states which haven’t required them have fared no worse than virtue-signaling urban enclaves in California and the Northeast.
And all that says nothing about the prospects of the children’s health, at being deprived of their relationship with their father.
There are factors that increase the risks of serious health consequences of COVID, but they have little to do with whether states or whole countries practiced strict lockdowns and mask-wearing protocols. They have to do with age and obesity. But woke concepts like “body positivity” forbid talking much about that, let alone shaping a more sensible public policy.
The Free Thought Project summed up the abusive power of the courts in suppressing political opposition to failed, socially and economically disastrous COVID policies: “‘Disagree with the government? We can now take your kids to keep them safe.’ See how that works?”
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
[15] And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah: [16] And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live. [17] But the midwives feared God, and did not as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the men children alive. [18] And the king of Egypt called for the midwives, and said unto them, Why have ye done this thing, and have saved the men children alive? [19] And the midwives said unto Pharaoh, Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women; for they are lively, and are delivered ere the midwives come in unto them. [20] Therefore God dealt well with the midwives: and the people multiplied, and waxed very mighty. [21] And it came to pass, because the midwives feared God, that he made them houses. [22] And Pharaoh charged all his people, saying, Every son that is born ye shall cast into the river, and every daughter ye shall save alive.Exodus 1:15-22
The Covid insanity is and will continue to get worse. These are types of things where you need the Lord as your protector. You need to be praying daily for protection and for the Lord to protect you and your family; because this goes without saying that this is beyond appalling.
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
Romans 12:19 (KJV) Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
They would die before they took my child and i mean it.
Is this a legitimate thing, or is it another “wolves in the forest” psy-op they are using to scare people into submission and see what they can get away with? There is so much data and real science to back up the father, I dont understand how a judge can take away custody of his son based on his antimasking beliefs and antilockdown protest attendance, unless they are doing it on other grounds and this is just fodder for the media. And I find it suspicious that they didn’t say the father’s name? Is there a way to look up the court case? Wouldnt it be public records?