Legislation was introduced earlier this December by Linda Rosenthal, a New York State assemblywomen from the City’s West Side, that would make the covid-19 vaccine mandatory for those whom health officials deem who can “safely receive the vaccine.”
Rosenthal’s bill was unclear in some areas. Public health officials would have to set the “benchmark” for what is described as achieving “sufficient immunity.” The report stated that some individuals could be exempt from the vaccine if they have documentation from a health official saying they do not have to take it.
If the bill were to be passed, the bill known as “A11179” would require a covid vaccine be “administered in accordance with the Department of Health’s COVID-19 vaccination administration program and mandates vaccinations in certain situations.”
The State has a task force to review the vaccines. It’s only at the point where there’s a lack of herd immunity which protects every single resident in New York State that the Department of Health would step in.
Linda Rosenthal
The Daily Mail reported that David DiPietro, a colleague of Rosenthal in the assembly, called the bill “very dangerous.”
I find it ironic that so many of these people who are pro-choice say, ‘My body, my choice.’ But when it comes to a vaccine… now it’s my body, but it’s not my choice. The hypocrisy just drips off the wall with some of these people.
David DiPietro
The Trends Journal did a report on this as well, and Gerald Celente and his team give additional information and forecast:
TREND FORECAST: As we have forecast, there will be strong “Anti-Vax” movements in the United States and western nations as vaccination mandates are imposed on the general population.
It should be noted they were gaining strength before the COVID War in Italy and the U.S. began. Again, anti-vax, anti-establishment, “Off With Their Heads 2.0” will be among the major political platforms. (See our Top Trend for 2021, “ANTI-VAX, ANTI-TAX POLITICAL PARTIES.”)
TRENDPOST: The Wall Street Journal reported last week both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines come with possible short-term side effects that can range from mild to moderate in their severity.
The report said one regulatory agency in the U.K. informed medical practitioners that the Pfizer vaccine should not be administered to individuals who are prone to adverse allergic reactions. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said a deeper investigation is needed to understand a few severe cases.
The Journal pointed to Kristen Choi, a nursing professor at UCLA, who was part of a trial study. She told the paper she can’t be sure she received the Pfizer vaccine, but she reported a serious health issue after her second shot during the trial. She came down with a 104.9-degree fever and intense arm pain and chills.
She said she recovered after about 36 hours, but one of the trial’s research staffers told her the reaction was not uncommon. The FDA also said the second shot seems to lead to more side effects.
The Journal reported scientists to admit it is too soon to know if the “vaccines being raced into production will confer true and lasting immunity to infection. Nor is it clear if they will be as effective at preventing transmission as they were at reducing the severity of illness in trials.”
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
